Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Restfox review

Free#26 of 38 in API Clients

A focused open-source client for HTTP, WebSocket, and automated response testing.

6.5/10Editor score
Restfox6.5 Visit Restfox

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Restfox is an open-source, offline-first client for developers testing HTTP requests, socket connections, and WebSocket workflows. It is available as a web application and desktop distributions for Windows, macOS, and Linux, with Docker deployment also supported. Its MIT License and lightweight focus make it a practical fit for developers who want a focused testing client without a paid-plan structure.

The feature set covers core request work and several useful automation layers. Environment variable management supports switching request contexts, while plugins and JavaScript request/response scripts allow customization. Automated JavaScript response tests add repeatable checks, and collections and workspaces provide structure for organizing related requests. This combination gives Restfox more depth than a basic request sender, particularly for developers who want HTTP and WebSocket testing in the same application.

Restfox is most suitable when the priority is lightweight, open-source testing across web and desktop environments. Docker deployment extends its installation options, while the web and desktop coverage supports different working preferences. Its scope is narrower than a broader API platform: integrations and ecosystem coverage are limited, and the product is centered on request testing, scripting, collections, and response validation. Teams looking for a focused client should consider Restfox; teams needing a wider API lifecycle or collaboration environment may prefer a more expansive alternative.

Restfox pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports HTTP requests, sockets, and WebSockets
    • Includes environments, scripts, plugins, and automated response tests
    • Available on web, Windows, macOS, Linux, and Docker
  • Where it doesn't
    • Integrations and ecosystem coverage are limited
    • Focuses on testing rather than broader API lifecycle tooling
    • Workspace organization is narrower than full team collaboration suites

Restfox fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update