Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

redb review

Free#25 of 30 in Embedded Databases

A focused Rust crate for durable embedded key-value data without a database server.

6.3/10Editor score
Visit redb
redb6.3 Visit redb

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

redb is a pure-Rust embedded key-value database for developers who want persistent storage inside an application rather than through a separate database server. It stores data in copy-on-write B+trees and exposes key-value tables through a BTreeMap-like API. The fit is strongest for Rust projects that need durable local data, transactional updates, and a compact database layer with direct integration into the application.

Its core storage and transaction features cover several practical durability needs. ACID-compliant transactions provide transactional updates, while MVCC supports concurrent readers and writers. Crash-safe commits, checksums, and crash recovery support persistent operation, and savepoints with rollbacks give applications a way to manage transaction state. The zero-copy access API is suited to applications where avoiding unnecessary data movement matters. redb is distributed under either the Apache License 2.0 or MIT License, and the published model is open source with a free plan.

Platform fit is a defining consideration. redb is delivered as a Rust crate, with an optional no_std build mode for targets that provide atomic compare-and-swap, including Cortex-M3 and above while excluding Cortex-M0. Its database model is deliberately focused on key-value tables and an API rather than a query language, so it suits embedded application storage more naturally than workloads organized around relational queries. Choose redb when Rust-native persistence, transactional safety, and embedded deployment are priorities. Choose an alternative when the project needs a standalone database server, a different programming ecosystem, or a broader query model.

redb pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • ACID transactions with MVCC for concurrent readers and writers
    • Crash-safe commits, savepoints, rollbacks, and persistent database files
    • Zero-copy access and optional no_std support for supported targets
  • Where it doesn't
    • Designed for Rust applications rather than standalone database-server use
    • Key-value tables use an API instead of a query interface
    • no_std support excludes Cortex-M0 targets

redb fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update