Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Quil review

Free#9 of 29 in Terminal Multiplexers

A focused open-source workspace for persistent, AI-assisted terminal work.

8.4/10Editor score
Visit Quil
Quil8.4 Visit Quil

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Quil is an open-source terminal multiplexer for developers managing multiple command-line tools and AI coding assistants. It runs on Linux, macOS, and Windows as a native terminal application, with no cloud account required. Its central use case is keeping complex development work organized across tabs, panes, working directories, and AI sessions. Typed panes give different workflows a defined place, including terminals, Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, OpenCode, Codex, SSH, Stripe CLI, lazygit, k9s, and lazysql.

Persistence is Quil's standout feature. The product continuously snapshots tabs, panes, layouts, working directories, and AI session identifiers, allowing a workspace to return after a host reboot. Automatic AI session resumption adds continuity for agent-assisted work, while cross-pane command and scrollback search helps navigate larger terminal sessions. Pane notes and project organization add lightweight context around ongoing tasks. This makes Quil a strong fit for individual developers who regularly switch between repositories, services, infrastructure tools, and AI coding sessions.

Its ecosystem is unusually broad for a terminal-focused tool. An MCP server enables AI-agent control, remote daemon attachment works over SSH, and TOML plugins support hot reload for customization. The trade-off is a local-first model: state is stored locally, collaboration is not supported, and there is no hosted version. Developers seeking a persistent personal workspace across terminal tools and AI agents should consider Quil; teams needing shared, cloud-managed sessions or built-in collaboration should choose a different type of workspace.

Quil pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Reboot-persistent snapshots preserve panes, layouts, directories, and AI sessions.
    • Typed panes support terminals, AI tools, SSH, Git, Kubernetes, and databases.
    • MCP control, SSH attachment, plugins, and broad developer-tool integrations.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Persistence is local rather than a cloud-synced workspace.
    • There is no built-in collaboration support.
    • No hosted version is provided; remote access uses SSH daemon attachment.

Quil fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update