Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Pysa review

Free#20 of 25 in Static Application Security Testing Software

A focused choice for Python teams that need customizable taint-flow analysis.

6.8/10Editor score
Pysa6.8 Visit Pysa

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Pysa is an open-source static application security testing tool for Python applications. It follows tainted data from defined sources to security sinks, helping teams investigate flows associated with issues such as remote code execution, SQL injection, and privacy concerns. Its audience is Python development and security teams that want source-code analysis with control over how application-specific data flows are modeled. Pysa runs on Linux and macOS, uses self-hosted deployment, and is distributed as part of the pyre-check package.

Its strongest capability is the depth of its taint-analysis model. Teams can define custom models in .pysa files and configure sources, sinks, rules, and features in taint.config. Sanitizers can remove or limit taint, while included models cover built-in and common Python libraries. Findings include source and sink trace information, and detailed results can be exported as JSON for further investigation. Supporting tools also provide interactive taint-model exploration, giving experienced users a way to examine and refine analysis behavior.

Pysa fits workflows that already use GitHub Actions or Visual Studio Code, with published support for both continuous integration and IDE use. The trade-off is its narrow focus: the category specification lists one supported language, Python, so teams with polyglot application portfolios may need another tool alongside it. Its packaging also deserves attention because Pysa is currently distributed through pyre-check and the official repository describes Pyre as deprecated. Choose Pysa when customizable Python taint-flow analysis is the priority; choose a broader alternative when language coverage or a more settled packaging direction matters more.

Pysa pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Detailed source-to-sink taint-flow traces for Python code
    • Custom models, rules, sanitizers, sources, and sinks
    • JSON export with GitHub Actions and VS Code support
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on Python rather than multiple programming languages
    • Self-hosted deployment requires local environment management
    • Packaging and maintenance direction may change with Pyre's deprecation

Pysa fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update