Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Pushpin review

Free#27 of 55 in WebSocket Tools

A self-hosted proxy that connects WebSocket clients to HTTP and messaging backends.

6.0/10Editor score
Pushpin6.0 Visit Pushpin

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Pushpin is a self-hosted reverse proxy for API creators and service teams that need real-time delivery through existing web services. It lets clients connect over WebSockets, HTTP streaming, or HTTP long-polling while translating WebSocket activity into HTTP requests for a backend. The model suits teams that want realtime connections without making clients aware of the proxy, rather than teams seeking a complete real-time application platform.

Its protocol and routing breadth is the main differentiator. Pushpin supports SockJS translation and publish-subscribe channels, and can route traffic to HTTP, WebSocket, or ZeroMQ targets. Applications can publish to connected clients through an HTTP control API or ZeroMQ inputs, while subscriptions are managed through backend instructions. That makes it useful as an intermediary across several transport patterns, but it also means backend behavior and application logic remain part of the implementation. Teams needing a managed service or a platform that supplies more of the application layer should look elsewhere.

Pushpin is documented as an open-source project and can run as a self-managed service on Linux or macOS. That avoids a listed subscription tier, while placing deployment and operation with the team adopting it. Support channels include community and email. Small, mid-market, and enterprise teams are listed as fits, though the deciding factor is likely whether they can operate a proxy and integrate its control and publishing paths. Choose Pushpin when the need is specifically to bridge realtime protocols to HTTP-oriented services; choose a broader service when you want a managed, end-to-end real-time application environment.

Pushpin pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Translates WebSocket events into HTTP requests and responses
    • Supports streaming, long-polling, SockJS, and pub/sub
    • Routes to HTTP, WebSocket, or ZeroMQ targets
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires self-managed deployment on Linux or macOS
    • Primarily proxies traffic rather than providing a full real-time application service
    • Publishing and subscriptions require backend integration

Pushpin fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update