Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

PurpleSharp review

Free#19 of 20 in Breach and Attack Simulation Software

A focused, free tool for ATT&CK-based Windows simulations and detection validation.

7.3/10Editor score
PurpleSharp7.3 Visit PurpleSharp

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PurpleSharp is an open-source C# adversary simulation tool for Windows Active Directory environments. It is designed for security teams building and testing detection analytics, validating detection resiliency, identifying visibility gaps, and inspecting event-logging pipelines. Simulations can run on local endpoints or remote endpoints over SMB and RPC, with command-line execution for operational control. Its coverage spans execution, persistence, privilege escalation, credential access, lateral movement, discovery, and defense evasion, with 47 documented MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

The tool’s strongest fit is focused ATT&CK testing with customizable scenarios. JSON playbooks let teams define simulations around their own validation goals, while endpoint reconnaissance tasks and cleanup controls support preparation and post-simulation handling. ATT&CK Navigator layer export and import provides a direct planning and review connection for teams that map testing activity to ATT&CK techniques. This combination gives PurpleSharp useful depth for detection engineering rather than positioning it as a broad security operations platform.

PurpleSharp is free and open source, with an on-premises deployment model and Windows platform coverage. That keeps the product suited to teams that want local control over simulations and do not need a commercial plan structure. The trade-off is a narrower operating scope: teams testing Linux, macOS, or other platforms should choose a tool with broader platform coverage. The lack of continuous scheduling also makes it less suitable for organizations seeking recurring, automated breach and attack simulation programs. Windows-focused teams running deliberate ATT&CK exercises should find the feature set aligned with that use case; teams needing wider coverage or ongoing scheduling should look elsewhere.

PurpleSharp pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Runs MITRE ATT&CK simulations locally or across remote Windows endpoints
    • Supports custom JSON playbooks and command-line execution
    • Exports and imports ATT&CK Navigator layers for campaign planning
  • Where it doesn't
    • Windows-only coverage limits cross-platform testing
    • On-premises deployment may require local infrastructure and administration
    • No continuous scheduling for recurring simulation programs

PurpleSharp fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update