Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

PMAP review

#19 of 25 in DevSecOps Platforms

A central control layer for correlating findings and managing remediation across security tools.

7.2/10Editor score
PMAP7.2 Visit PMAP

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PMAP is an enterprise vulnerability management platform from Privia Security Ltd. It is designed for security organizations that need to centralize results from multiple scanners, rather than manage each tool separately. The platform supports orchestration across VM, DAST, SAST, SCA, container, mobile, and network-discovery tools. Its core workflow covers ingestion, correlation, deduplication, prioritization, ownership, SLA tracking, and remediation, with asset and attack-surface inventory for broader visibility across complex organizations and subsidiaries.

Its strongest fit is a multi-tool security program that needs one operational layer across scanners and delivery systems. PMAP integrates with Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7, Nessus, Burp, Checkmarx, SonarQube, Snyk, GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps, along with Jira, ServiceNow, and ManageEngine for ITSM workflows. CI/CD security gates, scheduled reporting, risk analytics, approvals, and audit trails extend the platform beyond finding collection. Multi-tenancy, RBAC, and MFA also support organizations that need separated environments and controlled access.

The published commercial model is contact sales, so PMAP is suited to organizations prepared to evaluate an enterprise platform with the vendor rather than select a self-serve plan. Its breadth is valuable when scanner coordination, lifecycle ownership, compliance reporting, and governance are central requirements. Teams looking only for a focused scanner, a lightweight vulnerability tracker, or transparent self-service pricing may prefer a narrower alternative. PMAP should appeal most to security teams managing varied tooling, subsidiaries, and remediation accountability in one environment.

PMAP pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Correlates and deduplicates findings from multiple security scanners
    • Tracks ownership, SLAs, approvals, and remediation workflows
    • Connects security operations with ITSM and CI/CD security gates
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing is handled through a contact-sales model
    • The platform may be broader than teams with a single scanner
    • Requires coordination across scanners, workflows, and asset inventories

PMAP fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update