Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Plux review

Free#21 of 29 in Terminal MultiplexersVideo Downloaders

A focused open-source choice for persistent local Unix terminal sessions.

7.2/10Editor score
Plux7.2 Visit Plux

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Plux is an open-source terminal multiplexer implemented in Rust for Unix-like systems. It keeps shell processes and terminal state in a background daemon while an attached client handles input and ANSI rendering. Command-line users and developers working on Linux or macOS can create named sessions, detach and reattach to them, split panes, adjust layouts, and preserve terminal state locally. Temporary command sessions are also available through plux run.

Its main strength is focused terminal persistence rather than a broad platform ecosystem. Plux supports vertical and horizontal pane splitting, pane focus and zoom, split-ratio adjustment, scrollback history, history search, mouse selection, and clipboard integration. SSH remote attach adds reconnect support, while clipboard connections include wl-copy, xclip, xsel, and pbcopy. The published feature set also includes custom layouts, but persistence remains local and session synchronization is not supported. This makes Plux suited to users who want a compact Unix workflow centered on durable terminal sessions and pane management.

Plux is distributed as MIT-licensed open-source software, with no paid tier structure described. Its scope is deliberately narrow: Windows is unsupported, and the category specifications list no collaboration or plugin and extension system. Those constraints matter for teams that need shared sessions, synchronized state, or an extensible multiplexer environment. Users who primarily need local persistence, SSH reconnect, and core pane and history controls should find the feature set well aligned; users requiring cross-platform access, collaboration, synchronized sessions, or plugins should choose a product built around those capabilities instead.

Plux pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Persistent daemon-managed sessions with named detach and reattach
    • SSH remote attach with reconnect support
    • Panes, scrollback search, mouse selection, and clipboard integration
  • Where it doesn't
    • Windows is unsupported
    • No session synchronization or collaboration features
    • No plugin or extension system

Plux fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update