Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Pinner review

#14 of 26 in IPFS Hosting Services

CLI-first IPFS pinning and static hosting with monthly storage and transfer quotas.

7.7/10Editor score
Visit Pinner
Pinner7.7 Visit Pinner

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Pinner provides IPFS file uploads, CID pinning, and static website hosting, with content stored across Sia network hosts and cryptographic storage proofs. It suits solo users and small to mid-market teams that want a defined monthly quota for storage and file transfer, plus developer workflows through a CLI or JavaScript SDK. The product is CLI-first for pinning rather than a browser-based upload service, so it is a less natural fit for people who expect to manage content through a web interface.

According to the vendor's pricing page, the monthly plans are Entry at $5 for 250 GB per quota, Starter at $10 for 1 TB per quota, Standard at $50 for 5 TB per quota, and Premium at $100 for 10 TB per quota. Each quota applies to storage, upload, and download. There is no free plan. Annual billing is advertised as two months free, though the published page does not display annual amounts. The page also describes a 30-day money-back guarantee for founding accounts and says terms differ after the founding period. Buyers should compare the tier quotas with their expected storage and transfer needs rather than treating storage as the only limit.

The main distinction is the combination of pinning and hosted static websites: users can upload files to receive an IPFS CID or pin an existing CID, then host a static site with a custom domain. CLI access and a JavaScript SDK make it oriented toward developer-managed workflows, while API access is also listed. Pinner does not provide a public anonymous IPFS gateway, which rules it out for users specifically seeking one. Choose it for quota-based pinning and static hosting; consider another service if a free tier, browser-based uploads, or an anonymous public gateway is essential.

Pinner pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Each paid tier lists storage, upload, and download quotas.
    • CLI and JavaScript SDK support uploads and pin management.
    • Static hosting includes custom domains.
  • Where it doesn't
    • There is no free plan.
    • Uploads and pin management are CLI-first, not browser-based.
    • No public anonymous IPFS gateway is provided.

Pinner fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update