Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

PEAR review

Free#69 of 92 in Package Managers

An open-source PHP package manager focused on reusable components and legacy distribution workflows.

5.3/10Editor score
Visit PEAR
PEAR5.3 Visit PEAR

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

PEAR is an open-source framework and distribution system for reusable PHP components. Its PEAR Installer handles package installation, upgrades, dependency handling, installed-package registries, and package channels from the command line. Developers can also create and distribute packages defined by package.xml metadata. Support for Windows, Linux, and macOS makes it relevant to PHP developers maintaining reusable libraries or applications across desktop and Unix-like environments. Its strongest fit is legacy PHP package distribution rather than a broad modern application workflow.

The package lifecycle is the main strength. PEAR can install required and optional dependencies, work with PEAR-compatible channels, and download packages for offline installation. It supports phar, tar, tgz, and zip package formats, while package.xml records versions, channels, files, and dependencies. PECL integration extends the installer to PHP extension packages, giving teams a related route for distributing both PHP components and extensions. These capabilities suit projects that need package creation, repository distribution, or installation on systems with limited connectivity.

PEAR is less suitable when verified lockfiles or newer dependency workflow features are central requirements. Dependency resolution and private registry authentication are supported, but the published feature set remains centered on PEAR's package metadata, channels, and installer model. Developers maintaining established PHP codebases should consider PEAR when compatibility with PEAR packages, PECL extensions, or offline distribution matters. Teams seeking a more modern workflow built around lockfile verification and broader tooling should choose an alternative package manager.

PEAR pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Installs packages and resolves required and optional dependencies.
    • Supports PEAR-compatible channels, PECL extensions, and offline installation.
    • Creates and distributes package archives using package.xml metadata.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Does not provide verified lockfiles for dependency reproducibility.
    • Modern workflow features are narrower than newer package managers.
    • Package management depends on PEAR-compatible metadata and channels.

PEAR fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update