Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

OWASP Security-C4PO review

Free#32 of 34 in Penetration Testing Software

A focused free option for organizing pentests, findings, statuses, and reports.

6.0/10Editor score
OWASP Security-C4PO6.0 Visit OWASP C4PO

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

OWASP Security-C4PO is an open-source web application for managing and documenting penetration tests. It is aimed at beginners through professional pentesters serving clients who need a central place to organize engagements, record vulnerabilities and risk-related findings, track finding statuses, and generate reports. The product runs on the web and supports self-hosted, on-premises deployment. Its published role is pentest management and documentation, with workflows oriented around the OWASP Testing Guide rather than a broad testing engine for web, API, network, or mobile assessments.

The main appeal is its focused workflow and pricing model. It is free and open source, so teams can deploy it locally with Docker and keep the application in a self-hosted environment. Core capabilities include a central overview of penetration tests, finding documentation, risk-related details, status visualization, and actionable report generation. The project also includes separate application, API, reporting, database, and authentication services, giving the deployment a defined service structure. For teams that want a straightforward foundation for organizing OWASP-oriented work without a paid tier, this is a clear fit.

C4PO is narrower than a full-featured pentest platform. The published feature set centers on organization, documentation, visualization, and reporting, with no listed AI features or evidence-capture capability. That makes it suitable for basic engagement coordination and finding management, especially where Docker-based local deployment is acceptable. Teams seeking a dedicated tool for performing tests, capturing evidence, or supporting a broader range of assessment workflows should choose a product with those capabilities explicitly included. C4PO is the better choice for users prioritizing an open-source, OWASP-oriented documentation workflow over extensive testing operations.

OWASP Security-C4PO pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Free and open source for local, self-hosted deployment
    • Centralizes findings, risk details, statuses, and engagement overviews
    • OWASP Testing Guide workflow with actionable report generation
  • Where it doesn't
    • Focused on organization and documentation rather than test execution
    • No evidence-capture feature is listed
    • Docker deployment requires self-hosted setup

OWASP Security-C4PO fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update