Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

OWASP DefectDojo review

Freemium#3 of 23 in Application Security Orchestration Platforms

A flexible open-source hub for importing, triaging, prioritizing, and tracking security findings.

9.0/10Editor score
OWASP DefectDojo9.0 Visit DefectDojo

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

OWASP DefectDojo is an open-source DevSecOps platform for organizations that need to aggregate, organize, standardize, and track application security findings. It is suited to security and engineering teams managing results from multiple application security tools, with support for imports and reimports from 500+ supported tools. The platform covers finding deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, false-positive handling, risk-based prioritization, remediation SLAs, reporting, and issue-tracking synchronization. It is available through web, API, and self-hosted deployment models.

Its ecosystem fit is a central strength. DefectDojo connects with Jira, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Freshservice, GitHub, GitLab Boards, Linear, PagerDuty, ServiceDesk Plus, ServiceNow, Shortcut, and Zendesk. The REST API and Swagger UI provide an additional integration path, while dashboards, metrics, and reporting support security program oversight. The Free edition includes core finding import and deduplication, manual import and reimport, API access, a basic dashboard, reporting, and Jira capabilities. This makes the platform relevant for teams that want a central finding-management layer without making issue tracking their primary security system.

The paid Pro edition adds role-based access control, tunable deduplication, Rules Engine automation, priority scoring, a cloud-hosted option, premium support and SLAs, tenant isolation, and encryption at rest. Pro pricing is quote-based. Organizations should choose DefectDojo when open-source control, broad tool ingestion, configurable workflows, and ticket synchronization matter most. Teams needing advanced automation, enterprise-oriented controls, or cloud hosting should evaluate Pro, while teams seeking only a narrow vulnerability scanner may find its broader finding-management scope unnecessary.

OWASP DefectDojo pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Imports and reimports findings from 500+ supported security tools
    • Deduplication, triage, risk acceptance, SLAs, and remediation workflows
    • REST API, Swagger UI, dashboards, reporting, and ticket synchronization
  • Where it doesn't
    • Priority scoring and Rules Engine automation require Pro
    • Role-based access control and tenant isolation are Pro features
    • Pro uses quote-based pricing rather than a published price

OWASP DefectDojo fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update