Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

OpenText Application Security Posture Management review

#10 of 17 in Application Security Posture Management Software

A broad ASPM layer for correlating findings, prioritizing risk, and managing remediation.

8.2/10Editor score
OpenText Application Security Posture Management8.2 Visit OpenText

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

OpenText Application Security Posture Management centralizes application security data across SAST, DAST, software composition analysis, container security, penetration testing, and other sources. It normalizes findings, correlates them with software asset inventories, and gives enterprise security, development, QA, and business teams a shared view of application risk. The product is designed for cloud-native, hybrid, and enterprise application security programs, with web and API access and a hybrid deployment option.

Pricing follows a contact-sales model rather than published plan tiers. The product connects with GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, and Jira, supporting development and CI/CD workflows. API access and query capabilities add another route for accessing security information. These integrations fit organizations that want application security reporting connected to development processes, although the available integration set is comparatively limited for teams with a wider tool landscape.

Its main strength is breadth: OpenText combines findings from multiple testing and security disciplines, then adds business-context prioritization, centralized dashboards, risk, health, compliance, and trend reporting, policy enforcement, and remediation workflows. That combination suits large organizations that need standardized reporting across application portfolios and teams. Smaller programs or teams seeking a narrower tool focused on a single testing source may find the scope and contact-sales purchasing process less suitable. OpenText is the stronger fit for established ASPM reporting and cross-team governance than for lightweight, narrowly focused application security management.

OpenText Application Security Posture Management pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Correlates SAST, DAST, SCA, container, and penetration-testing findings
    • Prioritizes vulnerabilities using application and business context
    • Adds reporting, policy enforcement, and remediation workflows
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing requires contact with sales
    • Integration coverage is comparatively limited
    • Its broad scope may exceed narrower ASPM needs

OpenText Application Security Posture Management fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update