Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

OnlineOrNot review

Freemium#38 of 42 in Synthetic MonitoringStatus Page Software

A status-page layer for teams connecting monitoring, incidents, and notifications.

5.5/10Editor score
OnlineOrNot5.5 Visit OnlineOrNot

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

OnlineOrNot combines uptime monitoring with public and private status pages for software teams, agencies, and developers. It supports incident publishing, scheduled maintenance windows, service components, uptime history, and email subscriber notifications. Teams can connect status pages to OnlineOrNot checks or external monitoring providers, while password protection and custom domains support controlled stakeholder access. The product is suited to teams that need a communication layer around service availability rather than a standalone synthetic monitoring system.

The pricing structure starts with a free Hobby plan for up to 2 users, a limited status page, and basic alerting. Pro costs $15 per month and adds unlimited users, 10 monitors, a status page, SMS, webhooks, and on-call integrations. Enterprise provides custom inclusions, custom integrations, dedicated support, and a 99.9% SLA. A 14-day free trial is also available. This progression makes Hobby suitable for a small, basic status-page deployment, while Pro is the practical tier for teams that need broader notification and monitoring workflows.

OnlineOrNot fits an ecosystem-led monitoring workflow through integrations with Pingdom, Uptime Robot, Slack, Discord, Telegram, PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Grafana OnCall, incident.io, and webhooks. Its public API, third-party status components, component groups, automatic SSL, and custom domains extend the status-page layer across internal and external services. The trade-off is scope: teams looking primarily for deep synthetic checks should choose a dedicated synthetic monitoring product instead. OnlineOrNot is a better fit for organizations that already have monitoring sources and need clear incident communication, maintenance publishing, and stakeholder subscriptions in one place.

OnlineOrNot pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Public and private status pages with incident and maintenance updates
    • Connects to Pingdom, Uptime Robot, Slack, and on-call tools
    • Custom domains, automatic SSL, APIs, and subscriber notifications
  • Where it doesn't
    • Not a core synthetic-check platform
    • Hobby is limited to 2 users and a limited status page
    • SMS, webhooks, and on-call integrations start on Pro

OnlineOrNot fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update