Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Octopus Newsroom user reviews

Verified vendor #5 of 20 in Newsroom Management Systems Software

2 reviews from readers who use Octopus Newsroom — average 5.0/5. The editor score of 8.7/10 is our own, separate research.

8.7/10Editor score
Octopus Newsroom8.7 Try Octopus Newsroom
5.0/5 ★★★★★★★★★★ User rating · 2 reviews
  1. 52
  2. 40
  3. 30
  4. 20
  5. 10

Editor score 8.7/10 is our own research. User rating 5.0/5 is what readers say — every review is read by an editor before it appears, and none is ever paid for.

  1. ★★★★★

    best newsroom computer system (NRCS) for us

    For me, the biggest advantage is that Octopus adapts to how each team works instead of forcing everyone into the same workflow. TV stays rundown-based, while digital and radio stay story-centric, but underneath it's still one shared story. Reporters write once, then publish everywhere. Instead of maintaining five copies of the same story—and five chances for mistakes—we make one correction and it updates everywhere. That's where most of the time savings and error reduction came from. It also performs under pressure. During breaking news, producers use Element Skipping to remove stories that no longer fit, and the rundown automatically rebalances. Field reporters file directly into the same story through the Octopus Web Client, so the newsroom sees updates in real time. Even on our busiest nights, with everyone working in the same rundowns and wires constantly arriving, the system keeps up. The AI was another big step forward because it runs on our own servers, so nothing leaves the newsroom. Headlines, summaries and translations come through as suggestions that journalists can edit or reject, while transcription and tagging happen automatically. Editorial decisions always stay with us. We also didn't have to replace everything we already owned. Octopus integrated with our graphics, playout and MAM systems through MOS, so we migrated in phases instead of risking a big-bang switch. The ROI came from keeping our existing equipment, eliminating duplicate work across platforms, and giving us the flexibility to change workflows ourselves without paying developers each time. Adoption was easier than expected. The browser-based client meant no complex desktop rollout, and our editors could build new approval workflows themselves using the No-Code Workflow Designer instead of raising IT tickets. With support teams in Prague, New York and Bangkok, we always had help when we needed it. That's what modernising a newsroom should feel like.

    Pros
    • Teams keep their preferred workflows (rundown- or story-centric).
    • Stories are created once and published everywhere.
    • Significant time savings by eliminating duplicate work.
    • Handles breaking news with automatic rundown adjustment.
    • AI assists with headlines, summaries, transcription and tagging while journalists stay in control.
    Cons
    • No major drawbacks overall.
    Megan Jones · Editor-in-Chief, TV GOUsed it for 2+ years ✓ Verified account 0
  2. ★★★★★

    The Best Newsroom Computer System (NRCS)

    For me, the biggest advantage is flexibility. TV teams stay rundown-based while digital and radio remain story-centric, but everyone works from the same shared story. Reporters write once, publish everywhere, and a single correction updates every platform—saving time and reducing errors. It also handles breaking news well. Element Skipping automatically rebalances the rundown, while the Octopus Web Client lets field reporters update stories in real time. Even on the busiest news days, the system keeps up. The AI runs on our own servers, so newsroom data stays private. It suggests headlines, summaries and translations, automates transcription and tagging, but journalists always make the final editorial decisions. Implementation was straightforward because Octopus integrated with our existing graphics, playout and MAM systems through MOS, allowing a phased migration. We kept our existing infrastructure, cut duplicate work, and can adjust workflows ourselves without relying on developers. The browser-based client made adoption easy, and the No-Code Workflow Designer lets editors build workflows without IT support. Combined with responsive global support, it's exactly what modern newsroom software should be.

    Pros
    • Teams keep their preferred workflows (rundown- or story-centric).
    • Stories are created once and published everywhere.
    • Significant time savings by eliminating duplicate work.
    • Handles breaking news with automatic rundown adjustment.
    • AI assists with headlines, summaries, transcription and tagging while journalists stay in control.
    Cons
    • No major drawbacks overall.
    Megan Jones · Editor-in-Chief, GO-TVUsed it for 2+ years ✓ Verified account 0
Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Your rating

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Posted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Reviews moderated by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Editor score and verdict on the profile

Last updated · How we research and update