Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Nuster review

Free#27 of 33 in Reverse Proxy Software

A cache-focused reverse proxy for self-hosted HTTP and TCP deployments.

6.1/10Editor score
Nuster6.1 Visit Nuster

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Nuster is an open-source, self-hosted HTTP and TCP proxy and load balancer based on HAProxy. It is aimed at teams that need cache-heavy traffic handling alongside TLS termination, routing policies, monitoring, stickiness, and content switching. Frontend and backend HTTPS support, HTTP/2, Docker deployment, and text-file configuration make it suitable for infrastructure teams managing their own proxy layer. Its focus is broader than basic forwarding because caching is a central part of the product rather than an add-on detail.

Caching is Nuster's standout capability. It supports dynamic HTTP response caching with cache management, purging, statistics, TTL controls, and disk-persistent storage. The RESTful NoSQL key-value cache adds another storage-oriented option, while ACL-based routing and caching policies provide control over how requests and responses are handled. A manager and purge API supports operational workflows, and the software can be built from source or run with Docker. This combination fits deployments where cache behavior, persistence, and policy control matter as much as load distribution.

Nuster uses an open-source, self-hosted model, so teams should be prepared to own deployment, configuration, monitoring, and ongoing operations rather than select among paid service tiers. Its listed platform coverage centers on Linux and API access, with configuration managed through text files. Organizations that want a focused cache and proxy layer for HTTP and TCP traffic should consider Nuster; teams looking for a broader managed ecosystem or requiring WAF, WebSocket support, or dedicated rate-limiting capabilities should evaluate alternatives.

Nuster pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines HTTP and TCP load balancing with frontend and backend HTTPS.
    • Provides dynamic caching, purging, statistics, TTL controls, and disk persistence.
    • Supports ACL policies, Docker deployment, and manager and purge APIs.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment requires operational ownership.
    • Platform coverage centers on Linux and API access.
    • Teams needing WAF or dedicated rate limiting should assess alternatives.

Nuster fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update