Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Best Moon Alternatives in 2026

#15 of 30 in AI Recruiting Assistants

The top Moon alternatives are Paradox, Alex AI and Phenom Hiring Assistant: 15 AI recruiting assistants our editors would look at instead of Moon, in our ranking order.

6.8/10Editor score
Moon6.8 Visit Moon

Moon: A broad web-based recruiting workflow that keeps hiring decisions with your team. Where it falls short: available through the web only.

Switching from Moon? For most ai recruiting assistants buyers the best Moon alternative is Paradox, built for high-volume conversational hiring teams. On a budget, Metaview starts at $60/user/mo. Metaview has a free plan.

Why People Look for a Moon Alternative

  • Available through the web only
  • Pricing requires a demo or order form
  • Labeled beta, which may not suit teams seeking a mature product

Quick Picks by What You Need

All 15 Moon Alternatives, Ranked

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

  1. Paradox

    Best forHigh-volume conversational hiring teams

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 8.9 vs 6.8

    A broad conversational recruiting suite for enterprise and high-volume hiring.

    Pricing on request Our Paradox verdict → Visit Paradox
    8.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Paradox
  2. Alex AI

    Best forATS-centered screening and fraud-aware interviews

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 8.6 vs 6.8

    A broad ATS-centered recruiting assistant with fraud-aware interviews and custom enterprise pricing.

    • Candidate messaging
    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    Pricing on request Our Alex AI verdict → Visit Alex AI
    8.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit Alex AI
  3. Best forLarge employers using career-site hiring journeys

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 8.5 vs 6.8

    A career-site recruiting assistant that connects candidate intake, screening and scheduling.

    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    • Interview scheduling
    8.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Phenom
  4. Hirin

    Best forTeams wanting full-cycle AI recruiting with mobile access

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.9 vs 6.8

    A broad AI recruiting suite with mobile access, automation, and a 30-day trial.

    30-day trial Our Hirin verdict → Visit Hirin
    7.9/10★★★★☆
    Visit Hirin
  5. Best forTeams hiring at volume across multiple channels

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.8 vs 6.8

    Full-funnel recruiting automation with multi-channel sourcing, screening, and scheduling.

    • Candidate messaging
    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    7.8/10★★★★☆
    Visit Adya
  6. Best forRecruiters automating phone screening and ATS updates

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.7 vs 6.8

    A broad recruiting automation platform for phone screening, follow-up, and ATS updates.

    • Candidate messaging
    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    Pricing on request Our Asendia AI verdict → Visit Asendia AI
    7.7/10★★★★☆
    Visit Asendia AI
  7. Best forHigh-volume multilingual phone screening

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.6 vs 6.8

    A phone-first recruiting assistant for multilingual, high-volume hiring teams.

    • Candidate messaging
    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    7.6/10★★★★☆
    Visit JobTalk AI
  8. Best forBias-conscious asynchronous video screening

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.5 vs 6.8

    A focused web platform for structured, bias-conscious asynchronous video screening.

    7.5/10★★★★☆
    Visit Sapia.ai
  9. Best forRecruiters prioritizing large-scale sourcing

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.4 vs 6.8

    A large-scale recruiting workspace spanning search, enrichment, outreach, and screening.

    7.4/10★★★★☆
    Visit SeekOut
  10. Kula

    Best forGrowing teams needing ATS, CRM, and sourcing together

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.3 vs 6.8

    A broad recruiting system for teams that want sourcing, hiring workflows, and analytics together.

    7.3/10★★★★☆
    Visit Kula
  11. Screened

    Best forLow-cost teams focused on resume and phone screening

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.2 vs 6.8

    A focused AI screening assistant for teams that want ATS-connected resume and phone screening.

    • ATS integration
    • Interview scheduling
    • Application screening
    7.2/10★★★★☆
    Visit Screened
  12. Metaview

    Best forTeams improving interview notes and scorecards

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.1 vs 6.8

    A strong fit for interview intelligence, with sourcing and automation beyond its core.

    7.1/10★★★★☆
    Visit Metaview
  13. hireEZ

    Best forEstablished sourcing teams needing rediscovery and outreach

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 7.0 vs 6.8

    A broad AI recruiting suite for established teams that can justify $494 monthly.

    7-day trial Our hireEZ verdict → Visit hireEZ
    7.0/10★★★★☆
    Visit hireEZ
  14. Sprad

    Best forBudget-conscious teams wanting a complete recruiting stack

    • Better than Moon:
    • Editor score 6.9 vs 6.8

    A broad recruiting stack with a free ATS and usage-based AI modules.

    • Candidate messaging
    • ATS integration
    • Sourcing automation
    Free plan Our Sprad verdict → Visit Sprad
    6.9/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Sprad
  15. Avery

    Best forSmall teams focused on semantic sourcing

    Avery suits small teams that want explainable semantic sourcing across European profiles.

    Free plan Our Avery verdict → Visit Avery
    6.7/10★★★☆☆
    Visit Avery

Moon Alternatives: Common Questions

What is the best alternative to Moon?

Paradox: #1 in our AI Recruiting Assistants ranking, with an editor score of 8.9 out of 10. A broad conversational recruiting suite for enterprise and high-volume hiring.

Is there a free alternative to Moon?

Yes. Metaview, Sprad and Avery have a free plan or a free tier.

What is the cheapest paid alternative to Moon?

Of the alternatives here that publish a price, Metaview starts lowest, at $60/user/mo.

Why do people look for Moon alternatives?

Available through the web only; Pricing requires a demo or order form; Labeled beta, which may not suit teams seeking a mature product.

How do I switch from Moon?

Export your data from Moon (most tools have an export in their settings). Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Moon.

How to Switch from Moon

  1. Export your data from Moon (most tools have an export in their settings).
  2. Sign up for the alternative; start on its free plan or trial if it has one.
  3. Import your export and set up the integrations your team relies on.
  4. Run both side by side for a short while, then cancel Moon.

Moon vs Each Alternative

#ToolFree planPaid fromApplication screeningInterview schedulingScore
15MoonYesYes6.8
1ParadoxNo8.9
2Alex AIYesYes8.6
3Phenom Hiring AssistantYesYes8.5
4HirinNo₹10,000/mo7.9
5Adya Recruitment AgentNo$149/moYesYes7.8
6Asendia AIYesYes7.7
7JobTalk AINo$500/moYesYes7.6
8Sapia.ai Video Interviews7.5
9SeekOut RecruitNo$149/user/mo7.4
10KulaNo$5,120/yr7.3
11ScreenedNoYesYes7.2
12MetaviewYes$60/user/mo7.1
13hireEZNo$494/mo7.0
14SpradYes€99/moYesYes6.9
15AveryYes€299/mo6.7

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update