Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Mocki review

#20 of 26 in API Mocking Tools

A focused hosted and local mocking tool with useful response controls and a paid-only model.

7.1/10Editor score
Mocki7.1 Visit Mocki

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Mocki is a web-based API mocking service for developers and teams building or testing applications. It supports hosted mock API creation and local mock-server execution through a CLI, making it suitable for frontend development, backend integration testing, microservice testing, and work involving unavailable external dependencies. Its feature set covers REST and GraphQL API mocking, configurable endpoints, static or conditional responses, randomized responses, generated realistic test data, simulated errors, and response delays.

Pricing is straightforward but paid-only. The Starter plan costs $15 per month with monthly billing and includes prioritized support and a monitoring dashboard. A 7-day trial is available, while the published plans show one paid tier rather than multiple levels for different team sizes or usage needs. That simplicity may suit teams that want a hosted mock API without comparing several packages, but it gives buyers fewer options for matching cost to requirements. Users seeking a free ongoing plan should consider an alternative.

Mocki’s strongest distinction is the combination of hosted mocks, CLI-based local execution, and request-aware responses. Conditional behavior can use headers, path parameters, and query parameters, while randomized data, errors, and delays help represent more varied application conditions. GitHub-based configuration synchronization supports repository-centered workflows, and GraphQL mocking broadens its protocol coverage beyond REST. The product is a good fit for teams that value these controls and need a focused mocking service. It may be less suitable for organizations looking for a broad integration ecosystem, several paid tiers, or a free long-term option.

Mocki pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Conditional responses based on headers, paths, and query parameters
    • Hosted mocks plus local CLI-based mock-server execution
    • Supports REST, GraphQL, delays, errors, and generated test data
  • Where it doesn't
    • No ongoing free plan after the 7-day trial
    • Only one published paid tier, limiting plan choice
    • GitHub is the listed integration for configuration synchronization

Mocki fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update