Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

MFC review

Free#23 of 61 in Desktop App Development Frameworks

A Windows-only C++ framework with Win32 and COM wrappers and established desktop features.

7.0/10Editor score
MFC7.0 Visit Microsoft

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

MFC gives C++ developers a framework for building native Windows desktop applications. Its object-oriented classes wrap much of the Win32 and COM APIs and cover windows, menus, dialog boxes, and controls. The framework also supports document/view application architecture, serialization to and from persistent storage, printing, and print preview. It is a fit for teams maintaining or creating Windows-focused applications that want these framework facilities within a Visual Studio development workflow, rather than a cross-platform desktop toolkit.

The framework’s scope is deliberately Windows-specific: its listed target is Windows, and its deployment focus is desktop. Visual Studio’s MFC Application Wizard can generate starter projects, while MFC itself is an optional component of the C++ desktop development workload. This makes Visual Studio the relevant ecosystem for teams considering it. The listed capabilities are centered on native application structure and common interface elements; teams looking for mobile targets or a broader cross-platform UI stack should consider an alternative.

MFC is free, and Microsoft says the library remains supported. That support comes with an important lifecycle qualification: Microsoft is no longer adding features or updating the documentation. Teams choosing MFC should therefore weigh its established Windows-focused wrappers and document/view, serialization, and printing support against the absence of new feature development and documentation updates. It makes the most sense for Windows C++ teams whose requirements align with its existing capabilities, especially when working in Visual Studio; it is a weaker choice for projects that need active feature expansion, current documentation updates, or targets beyond Windows desktop.

MFC pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Wraps Win32 and COM APIs with object-oriented classes
    • Includes document/view architecture, serialization, and printing
    • Visual Studio wizard generates starter projects
  • Where it doesn't
    • Targets Windows desktop applications only
    • Microsoft says it is no longer adding features
    • Documentation is no longer being updated

MFC fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update