Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Mend SAST review

#10 of 25 in Static Application Security Testing SastStatic Application Security Testing Software

Mend SAST pairs source-code scanning with prioritization and AI fix suggestions.

8.2/10Editor score
Visit Mend
Mend SAST8.2 Visit Mend

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Mend SAST analyzes custom source code for security vulnerabilities, with features aimed at security and development teams managing codebases across web, mobile, server-side, and infrastructure-as-code projects. It brings findings into developer workflows through repository scanning, IDE integrations, and CI/CD pipelines. Contextual prioritization and AI-assisted remediation are central parts of its approach, making it a fit for teams that want guidance alongside static analysis rather than a list of code issues alone.

The published pricing presents Mend AppSec at $1,000 per contributing developer per year, billed annually. That bundle includes Mend SAST, Mend SCA, AI-generated code security, AI-powered fix suggestions, and automated dependency updates; the published amount is described as “Up to $1000 per dev per year.” This is bundle pricing, not a separately listed SAST tier, so buyers evaluating only source analysis should weigh the additional capabilities against their needs. There is no free plan in the published pricing details.

Workflow coverage is broad: integrations include JetBrains, Visual Studio Code-compatible IDEs, Cursor, and Windsurf, plus GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Jenkins, CircleCI, and GitHub Actions. Incremental analysis focuses on relevant code changes, and hardcoded secret detection adds another check within the source-code workflow. Scanning can run on-premises or in the customer environment, while findings, policies, and workflow management are handled in Mend's cloud. Teams that require cloud-managed findings should find this model relevant; those seeking a fully self-contained findings-management environment or a standalone SAST purchase may prefer to assess alternatives.

Mend SAST pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Prioritizes vulnerabilities using code context and supports incremental analysis.
    • Offers AI-powered remediation suggestions and fixes.
    • Integrates with IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD workflows.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Mend AppSec is priced at $1,000 per contributing developer annually.
    • The listed plan bundles SAST with SCA and other code-security features.
    • Findings and workflow management are handled in the Mend cloud.

Mend SAST fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update