Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Locust review

Free#7 of 37 in Performance Testing SoftwareTesting And QaSoftware Testing Tools

A flexible Python-based load testing tool for teams that want self-hosted control.

8.8/10Editor score
Locust8.8 Visit Locust

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Locust is an open-source performance and load testing tool for developers and test engineers who want to define simulated behavior in Python. It supports load, stress, browser, distributed-load, and API testing across web, Windows, macOS, Linux, and self-hosted environments. Teams can run workloads through a web interface, the command line, or headless execution, making it suitable for both interactive test development and automated execution.

Python-based scenario definition is Locust’s central strength. Test behavior is written as regular Python code, while the web interface reports throughput, response times, and errors in real time. Command-line execution supports headless operation, and distributed execution can span multiple processes or machines. CSV and HTML result reporting provide additional ways to review outcomes. The core supports HTTP/HTTPS load testing, while extensible protocol and client support broadens the types of systems that can be exercised.

Locust also fits teams working across a wider testing ecosystem. Documented extensions connect it with Playwright and Selenium/WebDriver for browser-oriented workloads, while listed integrations include gRPC, XML-RPC, SocketIO, OpenTelemetry, Docker, and Kubernetes. Its open-source, self-hosted model gives teams control over deployment and execution, but also makes environment management part of the implementation responsibility. Choose Locust when Python flexibility, distributed execution, and extensibility matter more than a fully managed testing service. Teams seeking built-in browser workflows or hosted operations may prefer an alternative with those capabilities as its primary experience.

Locust pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Define test scenarios in regular Python code
    • Run real-time, headless, or distributed tests
    • Extend workloads with protocols, clients, and integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment places operations on your team
    • Browser testing uses documented Playwright or Selenium extensions
    • Core HTTP/HTTPS coverage may require extensions for other protocols

Locust fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update