Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

linq_rs_sql review

Free#43 of 51 in Database Query Builders

A free Rust crate for compiling typed SELECT builders into SQL and bound parameters.

4.7/10Editor score
linq_rs_sql4.7 View linq_rs_sql

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

linq_rs_sql is a free Rust crate for building typed SQL SELECT statements from declared tables, columns, and predicates. Its type markers let the compiler check column and value types, making it a focused option for solo developers and small teams that want query construction in Rust without interpolating values into SQL. It builds statements; a separate database driver must handle execution.

The builder covers a useful but bounded set of SELECT operations: choose specific columns or all columns, add comparisons and AND, OR, NOT, LIKE, or IS NULL predicates, order results in either direction, and apply LIMIT and OFFSET. Calling to_sql() produces SQL text and a parameter vector, so values are represented as bound parameters rather than embedded in the SQL string. That scope suits straightforward reads where static typing and parameter binding matter more than a broad query API.

The main trade-off is breadth and ecosystem fit. The documented Phase 1 scope excludes JOINs, subqueries, GROUP BY, write queries, driver integration, and async support; the crate also supplies no database connections or pools. Choose it for small, typed SELECT-building needs when you already have a way to execute the generated SQL. If your application depends on richer query composition, async queries, or an integrated driver workflow, this crate's stated scope is likely too narrow.

linq_rs_sql pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Compiler-checked table, column, and value types
    • Supports common predicates, ordering, LIMIT, and OFFSET
    • to_sql() returns SQL text alongside bound parameters
  • Where it doesn't
    • Limited to SELECT; writes, joins, subqueries, and GROUP BY are out of scope
    • Does not execute queries or provide connections, pools, or drivers
    • No async support or database integrations

linq_rs_sql fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update