Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

LEADR review

Freemium#2 of 38 in Game Leaderboard Software

A flexible leaderboard backend with strong competition, anti-cheat, and game-engine support.

9.2/10Editor score
LEADR9.2 Visit LEADR

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

LEADR is a leaderboard backend for developers adding competitive and social features to games. It supports live-updating, recurring, seasonal, and time-limited boards, with configurable sorting, board types, and score retention. Score submission and leaderboard REST APIs, shareable public pages, anti-cheat detection, and score flagging cover the core service layer. The product is aimed at hobbyists, indie creators, and studios shipping across web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android, with a hosted cloud service and an open-source core available for self-hosting.

The published plans provide a clear freemium path. Free includes 10,000 score submissions per month, basic anti-cheat, LEADR branding, and community support. Indie costs €7.99 per month and raises the allowance to 100,000 score submissions, while adding custom branding and email support. Studio costs €129.99 per month and adds a custom domain, no usage limits, and priority support. That structure suits smaller teams that need more capacity or branding without immediately adopting an enterprise-style commitment. Teams requiring a custom domain or no usage limits need the Studio tier.

LEADR’s feature depth extends beyond a basic high-score table. Developers can connect Unity, Godot, Unreal, Steam, itch.io, webhooks, and embeds, while Unity and Godot SDKs support engine-level integration. Scores can carry replays, ghosts, and user-generated content, giving competitions more context than rankings alone. Public web pages support sharing outside the game, and recurring or seasonal boards can structure ongoing events. It is a strong fit for teams wanting a broad leaderboard backend and open-source deployment option; projects needing only a simple static ranking may find this feature set more than they need.

LEADR pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Live, recurring, and time-limited leaderboards
    • Anti-cheat detection, score flagging, replays, and ghosts
    • Unity and Godot SDKs plus REST APIs and webhooks
  • Where it doesn't
    • Free plan includes LEADR branding
    • Studio costs €129.99 per month
    • SDK coverage is listed for Unity and Godot

LEADR fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update