Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Keyorix review

Free#18 of 44 in Secrets Management Tools

A broad self-hosted secrets platform for DevOps teams with deployment control.

7.9/10Editor score
Keyorix7.9 Visit Keyorix

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Teams that cannot use SaaS can use Keyorix as an open-source secrets management platform for on-premise or air-gapped environments. It targets DevOps and security teams that need versioned secrets, development, staging, and production separation, role- and group-based permissions, service tokens, audit logging, and process-level secret injection. Deployment is available through a single binary or Docker Compose, with SQLite for development and PostgreSQL for production.

Keyorix’s feature depth extends beyond basic secret storage. It supports create, read, update, and delete operations with versioning, AES-256-GCM and envelope encryption, audit events, and short-lived credentials for databases, cloud IAM, and Kubernetes. Kubernetes ServiceAccount TokenRequest integration is also described. CLI injection can place secrets directly into processes, while CI/CD service tokens support automation workflows. These capabilities make Keyorix a fit for teams that need controls around access, rotation, automation, and workload credentials rather than a simple shared vault.

The ecosystem is broad for a self-hosted product: Keyorix offers REST and GraphQL interfaces, Python, Go, and JavaScript SDKs, a CLI, Docker Compose, PostgreSQL, SQLite, and Kubernetes support. The trade-off is operational ownership. Teams must run and maintain the deployment themselves, and there is no hosted option listed. Official configuration documentation describes dynamic-secret and Kubernetes backends, while some capabilities are identified as roadmap items, so release-specific availability matters. Choose Keyorix when self-hosting, open-source access, and deployment control outweigh managed convenience; teams wanting a hosted secrets service should consider a different tool.

Keyorix pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Versioning, RBAC, audit logs, and environment separation
    • Dynamic credentials and Kubernetes ServiceAccount integration
    • REST, GraphQL, CLI, SDK, Docker, and database support
  • Where it doesn't
    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the infrastructure
    • Some dynamic-secret and Kubernetes backends may vary by release
    • No hosted deployment option is listed

Keyorix fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update