INRA review
A citation-backed review workspace spanning narrative synthesis and systematic review tasks.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
INRA is an AI-assisted research platform for researchers, graduate students, clinical teams, policy groups, and R&D teams. It searches academic sources, retrieves papers, incorporates uploaded PDFs and reference-manager sources, and organizes evidence into citation-backed narrative reviews. Its SLR Copilot extends the workflow to protocol setup, citation import, screening, full-text eligibility review, structured extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, conflict resolution, and PRISMA-oriented outputs. It fits teams that need both narrative synthesis and systematic review support in one web-based workspace.
The main strength is breadth across the review lifecycle. INRA combines academic paper search with full-text analysis, inline citation inspection, and source verification, then adds dual screening, conflict resolution, study-data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. Support for Zotero and Mendeley helps bring existing references into the workflow, while integrations with Semantic Scholar, PubMed Central, PubMed, OpenAlex, arXiv, and Unpaywall broaden retrieval options. Export formats include Word, PDF, LaTeX, review data, RIS, BibTeX, CSV, and Excel, giving research teams options for downstream editing and analysis.
INRA uses a freemium model with a free plan. The Professional plan is $10 per month with annual billing and includes unlimited narrative literature reviews, full SLR Copilot access, priority email support, and Word, PDF, LaTeX, and review-data export. Teams & Institutions costs $7.50 per seat per month with annual billing, requires at least three seats, and adds centralised user management, billing, and dedicated onboarding and support options. Choose INRA for citation-backed reviews that need structured screening and evidence workflows; a web-only product with reviewer-controlled decisions may suit teams seeking AI assistance rather than fully automated research judgment.
INRA pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Generates narrative reviews with inline citation inspection and source verification
- Covers screening, extraction, appraisal, conflict resolution, and PRISMA outputs
- Supports Zotero, Mendeley, PubMed, OpenAlex, arXiv, and other research sources
- Where it doesn't
- Available on the web platform only
- Teams & Institutions requires at least three seats
- Reviewers must retain control of inclusion, extraction, and judgment decisions
INRA fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update