Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Ink review

Freemium#18 of 27 in AI Whiteboard Software

A structured, agent-driven whiteboard with publishing and a low-cost Pro tier.

7.4/10Editor score
Ink7.4 Visit Ink

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Ink is a browser-based infinite-canvas whiteboard for people collaborating with AI agents. It supports notes, tasks, documents, images, frames, connectors, forms, records, live-data blocks and embedded content. Teams can use it for project planning, diagramming, interactive wireframes, walkthroughs and agent-assisted collaboration. Web, iOS and Android access broaden availability, while publishing, sharing and website embedding make it suitable for lightweight distribution beyond the board itself.

The plan structure is straightforward. The Free plan costs $0 flat and includes unlimited boards, unlimited agent collaborators, publishing, sharing, embedding and going live, plus Interactive Pro blocks on 3 boards. Pro costs $5 per editor per month, billed monthly, and adds Pro blocks on unlimited boards, forms, records and live data everywhere, along with first access to new releases. Enterprise adds SSO and SCIM, agent permission policies, audit log export and regional data residency. This makes Pro accessible for individuals and small teams that need richer interactive boards, while larger organizations should evaluate the Enterprise feature set and commercial terms directly.

Ink’s main distinction is its structured, agent-accessible canvas. Agents can read and write boards through an API or MCP, and changes are attributed and undoable through versioned restore points. Claude, ChatGPT and MCP-compatible agent tools are supported, and sandboxed HTML renderers extend what boards can display. That focus suits teams building agent-assisted workflows or publishing interactive board experiences. It is less suited to buyers prioritizing a mature ecosystem of traditional whiteboard integrations or conventional server-side AI features. Choose Ink for agent-driven collaboration, structured board objects and publishing; consider an alternative if broad integration coverage is the primary requirement.

Ink pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • AI agents can create and edit boards through API or MCP access.
    • Free plan includes unlimited boards and unlimited agent collaborators.
    • Boards support publishing, embedding, live data, forms and versioned restores.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Traditional whiteboard integrations are limited.
    • AI functionality is agent-driven rather than server-side AI.
    • Enterprise pricing is not disclosed.

Ink fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update