InfoTrack

Paid#5 of 22 in Legal E-Filing Software

InfoTrack: A strong fit for firms that want automated filing, service, validation, and matter synchronization. Ranked #5 of 22 in Legal E-Filing Software by our editors (8.7/10); pricing: Paid; best for firms needing automation and integrations.

8.7/10★★★★☆Editor score

Visit InfoTrack

At a glance

• Editor score
  8.7 / 10
• Pricing
  Paid
• Best for
  Firms needing automation and integrations
• Free plan
  No
• Paid from
  $5/unit usage-based
• Filing status tracking
  Yes
• Facts checked
  21 Sep 2026

• Where it wins

  • Validates filings and identifies courts before submission
  • Extracts case data and populates court forms automatically
  • Integrates with 11 legal practice and document systems

• Where it doesn't

  • Coverage is limited to 10 listed state jurisdictions
  • Pricing is transaction-based rather than subscription-based
  • Physical filing and courtesy delivery carry higher transaction fees

Our verdict on InfoTrack

InfoTrack is litigation workflow software for law firms handling electronic court filing, electronic service, process serving, docket synchronization, document management, and related matter updates. Its filing workflow can read uploaded documents, extract case information, identify the court and filing type, populate forms, validate submissions against court-specific rules, and return file-stamped documents. The product is suited to firms that want filing activity connected to legal case and document-management systems rather than handled as a separate process.

The published plans use transaction-based pricing. SignIT eSignatures costs $5 per document for marking up, distributing, and collecting signatures on legal documents. DocketSync costs $10 and syncs the latest docket information to a case-management matter. Physical Court Filing costs $130 per transaction for courts accepting paper filings, while Courtesy Copy Delivery costs $165 per transaction for hand-delivery of paper copies to a court or judge. This structure may suit firms that prefer paying for specific workflows, but firms comparing predictable subscription budgets should review transaction volume carefully.

Integration and automation are the clearest reasons to consider InfoTrack. It connects with Clio, Filevine, Easysoft, iManage, LawToolBox, LEAP, MyCase, Neos, NetDocuments, Smokeball, and Time Matters, and offers web and API access. Filing status can synchronize to matter records, rejection alerts are available, and electronic service includes proof-of-service filing. OAuth 2.0 MCP access supports filing and service workflows. Court coverage spans California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland, Nevada, Texas, Utah, and Virginia, so firms operating outside those jurisdictions should consider a broader-coverage alternative.

Questions about InfoTrack

What does InfoTrack run on? Web. It runs in the cloud.

What does InfoTrack integrate with? 11 integrations, including Clio, Filevine, Easysoft, iManage and LawToolBox.

Who is InfoTrack built for? Small businesses, mid-market companies and enterprises (our editorial estimate).

Your product? Our editors can test InfoTrack in depth and publish a review, labelled as paid · from $149/mo →

InfoTrack pricing

All 4 InfoTrack plans and prices →

InfoTrack fact sheet

InfoTrack integrations

InfoTrack lists 11 integrations on its own site.

• Clio
• Filevine
• Easysoft
• iManage
• LawToolBox
• LEAP
• MyCase
• Neos
• NetDocuments
• Smokeball
• Time Matters

See all InfoTrack integrations →

Alternatives to InfoTrack

• eFileTexas.govFree statewide Texas e-filing with service, tracking, alerts, and file-stamped copies.9.3
• CECM/ECFA free web system for filing and managing cases across U.S. federal courts.9.2
• LLegalAtomsA broad legal filing platform spanning preparation, submission, service, and clerk workflows.9.0

See all InfoTrack alternatives →

InfoTrack vs the competition

• InfoTrack vs eFileTexas.gov
• CEInfoTrack vs CM/ECF
• LInfoTrack vs LegalAtoms
• InfoTrack vs FileTime
• EInfoTrack vs eFileIL
• TEInfoTrack vs Tyler eFile & Serve

Compare InfoTrack with any tool side by side →

Used InfoTrack? Be the first to review it

The editor score above is our own research. What this page doesn't have yet is a reader's view — what you used InfoTrack for, what worked and what didn't. No stars are seeded and no review is paid for; an editor reads every one before it appears.

Write a reviewTwo minutes · verified accounts only · read by an editor before it appears

Website

Reviews come only from verified accounts. Sign in or create an account first — your e-mail is never shown.

Your rating

5 stars★4 stars★3 stars★2 stars★1 star★

Title

Your review

0 characters · at least 80, up to 3,000

Pros (optional · one per line)

Cons (optional · one per line)

Your name (shown with your review)

Role (optional)

Company (optional)

How long have you used it?Prefer not to sayLess than a month1–6 months6–12 months1–2 years2+ years

I've used InfoTrack myself and this is my honest opinion — nobody paid or asked me to write it.

Send my reviewPosted from your verified account. Reviews appear after an editor reads them, usually within two working days.

Featured on iTechGuides

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated 14 Nov 2026 · How we research and update