Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Indusface WAS review

#13 of 26 in Dynamic Application Security Testing SoftwareMobile Application Security Testing SoftwareAPI Security Testing Software

Affordable managed DAST with authenticated scans, API testing, and manual verification.

8.2/10Editor score
Indusface WAS8.2 Visit Indusface WAS

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Indusface WAS is a cloud-based dynamic application security testing platform for web applications and APIs. It is designed for development, security, and operations teams that need automated vulnerability scanning with optional manual verification and penetration testing services. Its scanning coverage includes OWASP Top 10, SANS 25, zero-day vulnerabilities, HTML5, AJAX, and JSON applications. The platform also supports authenticated and guided scanning, API discovery, infrastructure and open-port scanning, and an AI crawler for expanded scan reach.

According to the vendor's pricing page, the Advance plan costs $59 per app per month and includes managed application security scanning, five proof-of-vulnerability requests, and a 14-day free trial. Premium adds unlimited proof-of-vulnerability requests and uses custom pricing. MSSP Edition also uses custom pricing and adds multi-tenant vulnerability management and consultant workflows. The plan structure makes Advance the clearest entry point for teams seeking managed scanning, while Premium and MSSP Edition target organizations with broader verification or service-provider workflows.

Indusface WAS fits teams that want scan results tied to remediation guidance, reproducible proof reports, and automated false-positive removal through manual verification. Jenkins and CI/CD pipeline support can connect scanning with development workflows, while SIEM provider integrations support scan-log exports. The product remains focused on web applications and APIs rather than a broader platform footprint, so teams needing coverage beyond web-based targets should consider alternatives. Choose Indusface WAS for affordable managed DAST with authenticated scanning and API testing; look elsewhere if a wider platform scope is essential.

Indusface WAS pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Authenticated, guided, API, and browser-based scanning
    • Manual false-positive verification with proof-of-vulnerability reports
    • Jenkins, CI/CD pipeline, and SIEM provider integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Web-only platform
    • No free plan
    • Premium and MSSP pricing require a custom quote

Indusface WAS fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update