Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Hadrian review

#25 of 31 in Attack Surface Management SoftwareSecurity Ratings Software

Hadrian combines continuous discovery with validated exposure testing and event-driven retesting.

7.3/10Editor score
Hadrian7.3 Visit Hadrian

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Hadrian is an offensive security platform for medium and large enterprise security teams. Its Atlas product continuously discovers and inventories internet-facing assets, monitors changes, validates exploitable exposures, and prioritizes risks using business context. The platform also covers cloud exposure visibility, remediation guidance, workflow integrations, attack path analysis, and API-based data retrieval. Its cloud-hosted, agentless approach is suited to teams that need ongoing visibility across external assets rather than occasional point-in-time assessment.

The two published plans serve different needs. Atlas focuses on continuous external exposure management, external attack surface mapping, exposure validation, and event-driven testing when assets change. Its pricing is based on total asset count and requires contacting sales. Nova is an on-demand agentic penetration-testing service priced at €3,000 per test, with full reporting and validated findings included. This makes Nova a defined option for teams seeking a discrete testing engagement, while Atlas is the broader choice for continuous monitoring and retesting.

Hadrian’s ecosystem fit is supported by integrations with Jira, Slack, ServiceNow, SentinelOne, Microsoft Teams, Datadog, GLPI, Zendesk, and HubSpot, alongside a REST API for integrations and data retrieval. Contextual prioritization, remediation guidance, and workflow connections help align findings with operational processes. Teams should choose Hadrian when validated external exposure, cloud visibility, and event-driven retesting are central requirements. Organizations seeking a free plan, a publicly listed Atlas price, or a narrower single-purpose scanner should consider alternatives that match those needs more directly.

Hadrian pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Continuous discovery, inventory, monitoring, and event-driven retesting
    • Agentic exposure validation with exploit confirmation and contextual prioritization
    • REST API plus integrations with Jira, Slack, ServiceNow, and more
  • Where it doesn't
    • Atlas pricing is based on total asset count and requires sales contact
    • No free plan is available
    • Nova is priced per test rather than as a general recurring tier

Hadrian fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update