Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

GUN review

Free#25 of 26 in Mobile DatabasesGraph Databases

A flexible self-hosted choice for offline-first, peer-synchronized web applications.

6.4/10Editor score
GUN6.4 Visit GUN

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

GUN is an open-source, decentralized graph synchronization protocol and embedded database engine for developers building realtime, offline-first applications. It is suited to teams that want peer-to-peer state synchronization, local data operation, encrypted application features, and control over deployment. GUN runs on the web and Linux, with self-hosted deployment using Docker or Linux. Its model support covers graph, document, table, and key/value data, giving developers several ways to structure application state.

The main technical strength is its combination of offline-first operation and distributed synchronization. GUN includes conflict resolution for distributed data, an embedded local database engine, end-to-end encryption, and cryptographic user authentication. GraphQL support extends its query and integration options, while framework integrations include Electron, React Native, Vue, Svelte, and Web Components. This makes it relevant for applications that need local operation and synchronization across peers rather than a conventional centralized database pattern.

GUN is a strong fit for developers comfortable with self-hosted infrastructure and decentralized application design. Deployment examples use Docker or Linux, and the project provides JavaScript APIs, tutorials, GraphQL references, framework examples, and modules for storage, authentication, encryption, and networking. Teams seeking a focused mobile database with broad verified platform coverage may prefer a mobile-focused alternative. Teams building web applications around peer synchronization, offline behavior, flexible data models, and deployment control should find GUN’s feature mix more aligned with their architecture.

GUN pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Offline-first peer synchronization with conflict resolution
    • Supports graph, document, table, and key/value data models
    • Encryption, authentication, GraphQL, and framework integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires self-hosted deployment and infrastructure management
    • Verified platform coverage is narrower than mobile-focused alternatives
    • Its broad feature set may require more architectural decisions

GUN fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update