Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Google SecOps SOAR review

#17 of 24 in Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Software

A Google SecOps SOAR tool for teams automating alert investigation and response.

7.7/10Editor score
Google SecOps SOAR7.7 Visit Google SecOps

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Security teams looking to coordinate alert investigation and response can use Google SecOps SOAR within Google Security Operations packages. It ingests and normalizes alerts from third-party tools, groups them into cases, and extracts entities such as indicators of compromise, IP addresses, and user accounts. Playbooks run ordered actions when predefined conditions are met; actions can be manual or automatic. The product is cloud-based, with web and API access, and fits mid-market and enterprise teams already considering Google SecOps.

The published packages add capabilities by tier. Standard includes base SIEM and SOAR capabilities, 300+ SOAR integrations, 12 months of hot data retention, and one environment with a remote agent. Enterprise includes Standard features and adds unlimited environments with a remote agent, UEBA, Google-curated detections, and Gemini in security operations. Enterprise Plus includes Enterprise features, then adds applied threat intelligence, advanced data filtering, redaction, transformations and routing, plus BigQuery UDM storage. Packages are quote-based and priced by ingestion, so buyers should compare the complete SIEM-and-SOAR package rather than expect a standalone SOAR price.

Its distinguishing workflow depth is the link between normalized alerts, case management, entity extraction, conditional playbooks, and remote operations such as firewall blocking or disabling accounts. Google Threat Intelligence, Mandiant, and VirusTotal are named integrations, while a Python SDK supports custom connectors. The playbook builder is code-first, which will suit teams comfortable defining workflows that way but may not suit buyers seeking a visual builder. Choose it when those response workflows and Google SecOps package capabilities align; teams seeking a standalone SOAR product or a visual-first builder should compare alternatives.

Google SecOps SOAR pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Normalizes alerts from third-party security tools into cases.
    • Playbooks can run actions manually or automatically on alert entities.
    • Remote response includes firewall blocking and disabling accounts.
  • Where it doesn't
    • Playbook builder is code-first, not a visual workflow builder.
    • Pricing is quote-based for packages that bundle SIEM and SOAR.
    • Advanced capabilities such as UEBA require Enterprise or higher.

Google SecOps SOAR fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update