Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Gluster review

Free#11 of 30 in Software-Defined Storage SoftwareDistributed File System Software

A broad self-hosted storage platform for teams that need replication and flexible access.

8.0/10Editor score
Gluster8.0 Visit Gluster

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Gluster is a free, open-source distributed network filesystem for teams building storage across multiple servers. It aggregates capacity into a global namespace and supports scalable deployments for data-intensive workloads such as media streaming and data analysis. The project is designed for Linux and self-hosted environments, with documentation covering on-premises, public-cloud, and hybrid deployments. It can run on commodity hardware and offers native GlusterFS access alongside NFS and SMB/CIFS.

The published model is open source with a free plan, so there are no paid tiers to compare. Its storage capabilities cover replicated volumes with automatic self-healing, dispersed volumes using erasure coding, asynchronous geo-replication across sites, point-in-time snapshots, quotas, and bitrot detection. This gives infrastructure teams several ways to balance availability, capacity efficiency, recovery, and operational control. Access can extend through iSCSI using GlusterFS integration and through Swift REST object-storage integration.

Gluster also fits into a wider infrastructure ecosystem through OpenStack Swift, Cinder, and Keystone, plus NFS, SMB/Samba, QEMU, ZFS, Bareos, Puppet, and Consul. That breadth suits organizations integrating storage with virtualization, cloud infrastructure, backup, configuration management, or service discovery. Its trade-off is the self-hosted operating model: teams must run and administer the storage environment, while commercial support is described separately from the community software. Choose Gluster when free, distributed storage with geo-replication and multiple access protocols matters more than a managed service experience; consider an alternative if you want vendor-operated infrastructure.

Gluster pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Global namespace with replicated and erasure-coded volumes
    • Geo-replication, snapshots, quotas, and bitrot detection
    • NFS, SMB, iSCSI, and Swift REST access options
  • Where it doesn't
    • Requires Linux and self-hosted deployment
    • Commercial support is separate from the community project
    • Broad capabilities can require specialist storage administration

Gluster fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update