Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

FireHOL review

Free#57 of 76 in Firewall Software

A focused, open-source choice for administrators who prefer configuration-driven Linux firewall control.

3.5/10Editor score
FireHOL3.5 Visit FireHOL

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

FireHOL is an open-source language and command-line program for generating stateful iptables packet-filtering firewalls on Linux hosts and routers. It is designed for administrators who want to define interfaces, routed traffic, clients, servers, services, and packet-matching conditions in readable configuration files. The scope fits both individual Linux systems and more complex routed networks, with support for local and forwarded traffic, IPv4 and IPv6, and filtering in both directions.

Its strongest technical fit is breadth within the firewall rule layer. FireHOL supports kernel connection tracking for stateful filtering, source and destination NAT, and packet matching by interface, source, destination, protocol, and ports. Service definitions let administrators control client and server traffic without reducing the configuration to isolated low-level packet conditions. It also logs indirectly dropped packets for troubleshooting. These capabilities make it suitable when outbound control, inbound filtering, routing, and address translation need to be expressed in one configuration-driven tool.

Operationally, FireHOL stays focused on the Linux command line rather than presenting a broader management platform. Administrators can use panic, try, stop, restart, status, and save commands, while installation is available from source or Linux distribution packages. That model suits teams managing Linux firewalls directly and wanting an open-source approach. It is a weaker fit for organizations seeking cross-platform administration, verified central management, integrations, or higher-level firewall features. Choose FireHOL for direct control of Linux iptables policies; consider an alternative when centralized governance or a broader ecosystem is the priority.

FireHOL pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports stateful IPv4 and IPv6 filtering with kernel connection tracking
    • Covers local and routed traffic, NAT, services, logging, and both directions
    • Provides operational commands including panic, try, restart, status, and save
  • Where it doesn't
    • Linux-only, with no support for other listed operating systems
    • Command-oriented configuration requires comfort with firewall rules and services
    • No verified central management or integration layer is provided

FireHOL fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update