Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Django Channels review

Free#13 of 55 in WebSocket Tools

A self-hosted Django library for WebSockets, ASGI routing, and background work.

7.4/10Editor score
Django Channels7.4 Try Django Channels

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Django Channels extends Django applications beyond ordinary HTTP request-and-response handling. Built on ASGI, it gives Django teams a way to route WebSockets and other long-lived protocols, define synchronous or asynchronous consumers, and offload work to background workers. It is a library to deploy and operate yourself, rather than a hosted WebSocket service, so it fits teams already building with Django that want these capabilities within that application environment.

Its protocol and ecosystem fit are the main draw. Channels provides ASGI protocol and URL routing for HTTP, WebSockets, MQTT, chat-oriented protocols, and custom protocols. Django authentication and session middleware can be integrated, while optional channel layers support messaging across processes, including groups. Redis support is available through channels_redis, and deployment can use Daphne or another ASGI protocol server. Testing utilities such as WebsocketCommunicator are also part of the offering. This combination makes Channels broader than a WebSocket-only component, while keeping its center of gravity in Django and ASGI.

The tradeoff is operational ownership and framework scope: teams deploy the library themselves and choose an ASGI server, and channel layers are optional rather than built into every setup. Background worker and task-offloading support may suit applications that need work outside request handling, but Channels is not a fit for teams seeking a managed service or a framework-neutral tool. Community resources and documentation are the listed support channels. Django teams that want to add real-time connections and background work should consider it; teams outside the Django ecosystem should look elsewhere.

Django Channels pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports synchronous and asynchronous WebSocket consumers
    • Integrates with Django authentication and session middleware
    • Optional channel layers enable cross-process messaging and groups
  • Where it doesn't
    • Designed around Django rather than general-purpose application frameworks
    • Requires self-hosted deployment with Daphne or another ASGI server
    • Cross-process messaging depends on optional channel layers

Django Channels fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update