Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

CodeLocker review

#14 of 28 in Code Signing Software

A broad signing and provenance platform for regulated software teams.

7.7/10Editor score
CodeLocker7.7 Visit CodeLocker

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

CodeLocker is a code-signing and attestation platform from Zeva Inc. for organizations that need software provenance across development and delivery. It supports federal agencies, prime contractors, enterprises, and regulated sectors including defense, healthcare, device manufacturing, and finance. The platform covers commit-level signing, source-code verification, binary signing, scripts, files, software artifacts, and SBOMs, giving teams a way to connect source changes with released software.

CodeLocker's ecosystem fit centers on the software delivery chain. It integrates with source-control repositories, build servers, CI/CD platforms, and identity management systems. Automated validation workflows, CI/CD pipeline integration, audit trails, and provenance tracking extend signing beyond a single release step. Centralized code-signing key management and compatibility with FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSMs address teams that need controlled protection for signing keys and traceable software operations.

The standout is breadth: CodeLocker brings commit signing, source verification, binary signing, SBOM signing and attestation, and long-term validation signatures into one governance-oriented platform. Pricing follows a contact-sales model, with the vendor directing prospective customers to book a demo or call. It is a strong fit for teams that need source-to-binary traceability, formal validation workflows, and supply-chain oversight. Teams seeking only a straightforward binary-signing utility may prefer a narrower product with less emphasis on provenance, attestation, and centralized governance.

CodeLocker pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Signs commits, source code, binaries, scripts, SBOMs, and artifacts
    • Connects signing with CI/CD, repositories, build servers, and identity systems
    • Supports centralized key management and FIPS 140-3 Level 3 HSM compatibility
  • Where it doesn't
    • Pricing requires a sales conversation
    • Its governance scope may exceed basic binary-signing needs
    • Broader workflows require more process than signing alone

CodeLocker fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update