Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

CivArchive review

#3 of 38 in Social Media Archiving Software

A public-sector archive with continuous capture, legal holds, and documented PDF exports.

9.2/10Editor score
CivArchive9.2 Visit CivArchive

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

CivArchive is a cloud-based social media archiving product for government agencies, municipalities, schools, and other public-sector organizations. It continuously captures configured social media, websites, and other sources while preserving metadata and deleted posts or comments with deletion events. Search filters cover platform, department, date range, and keyword, supporting public-records requests, audits, and litigation. Its standalone plan is focused on records preservation and compliance rather than general social media management.

According to the published plan details, CivArchive uses a contact-sales model, with pricing that scales with community size. The CivArchive standalone plan includes automatic social media archiving, FOIA-ready search and export, retention policies, and legal holds. There is no free plan. The web-based product connects with Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Nextdoor, YouTube, TikTok, Bluesky, Threads, and websites, giving agencies a wide range of configured sources to manage in one archive.

Its strongest capability is the connection between capture, preservation, and evidentiary export. One-click legal holds prevent deletion while active, configurable retention schedules support differing records policies, and one-click PDF exports include timestamps, URLs, engagement metrics, and chain-of-custody documentation. Content alerts can identify threats, profanity, or defined keywords, while historical archive migration preserves metadata. CivArchive suits organizations that need formal retention and litigation workflows; teams seeking a low-cost self-serve tool, a free tier, or a product centered on publishing and engagement should consider a narrower alternative.

CivArchive pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Continuous capture preserves configured social and web records
    • Legal holds and deleted-content preservation support litigation needs
    • PDF exports include timestamps, URLs, metrics, and chain-of-custody records
  • Where it doesn't
    • Custom pricing requires contact with sales
    • No free plan is available
    • Web access may not suit teams seeking native desktop workflows

CivArchive fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update