Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

CAAT review

#54 of 163 in Accessibility Testing SoftwareWebsite Accessibility Tools

A broad accessibility testing workspace for professional manual audit teams.

4.3/10Editor score
CAAT4.3 Visit CAAT

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

CAAT is a web-based accessibility testing platform for accessibility specialists, auditors, agencies, and organizations. It combines structured manual audits with automated website scans and PDF/UA testing. Teams can assess websites, mobile apps, desktop software, and PDF documents using built-in catalogs for WCAG, EN 301 549, mobile apps, software, and PDFs, or create custom test catalogs. Findings can include screenshots, source code, Markdown, and attachments, giving audit teams a structured place to document evidence and produce reports.

Pricing is organized around annual billing. Solo costs €500 per year and includes 10 manual audits annually, 500 automatic analyses per month, unlimited domains, and 1 user. Team increases capacity to 20 manual audits per year and 5,000 automatic analyses per month, with unlimited domains and 25 users. Studio provides 60 manual audits per year and 20,000 automatic analyses per month, while retaining unlimited domains and 25 users. A 15-day personal demo account is available, but CAAT is a paid product rather than a permanent free-plan tool. The main value question is whether the audit volume and evidence workflow justify the annual commitment.

CAAT has a broad scope for teams that need both manual review tools and automated checks across web, documents, mobile apps, and software. Website testing uses axe-core, while PDF checks use PAC or axesPAC technology. Collaboration includes comments and team permissions, and exports cover CSV, Jira, GitLab, and JSON workflows; integrations also include LanguageTool. This makes CAAT a strong fit for professional audit teams managing repeatable reviews and formal reporting. Organizations prioritizing a verified CI/CD workflow or a lower-cost entry point should consider an alternative.

CAAT pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Combines manual audits with automated website and PDF/UA testing
    • Supports custom catalogs, evidence, collaboration, and accessible reports
    • Exports issues through CSV, Jira, GitLab, and JSON workflows
  • Where it doesn't
    • Annual pricing starts at €500 before VAT
    • The Solo plan supports only one user
    • CI/CD workflow fit is not verified

CAAT fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update