BrowseEmAll review
An inexpensive local testing suite with strong comparison and automation features.
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
BrowseEmAll is an on-premises cross-browser testing application for developers and QA teams. It supports websites hosted locally or on private networks, with live testing, synchronized browser comparison, responsive checks, screenshots, layout comparisons, page analytics, regression recording and playback, and test exports to programming languages. Desktop and mobile browser simulators provide coverage across desktop and mobile resolutions, while the software runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux. It suits small teams that need local browser checks without relying on a broad cloud testing service.
Pricing separates manual testing, test creation, and scaled execution. The Manual plan costs $9.99 per user per month or $99 per user per year and includes manual testing, 12 months of maintenance, and a single user. Studio costs $19.99 per user per month or $99 per user per year, adding manual and automated testing, unlimited usage, a test recorder, test playback, live tests, and test comparison. Runtime starts at $6.99 per user per month and supports test execution at scale, playback, Selenium Grid, and 12 months of maintenance. A one-day trial is available, and there is no free plan.
The strongest fit is teams that value local or private-network testing, visual comparison, and a focused automation workflow. Selenium and Selenium Grid integration, command-line automation, and exportable tests make it suitable for teams that already work with those tools. Its main boundary is device and ecosystem breadth: browser and mobile coverage relies on simulators rather than real devices, and the listed integrations center on Selenium. Choose BrowseEmAll for focused desktop and simulated mobile browser checks; teams needing real-device testing or a wider cloud-service ecosystem should consider another product.
BrowseEmAll pros and cons
- Where it wins
- Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- Combines visual comparison with regression playback
- Supports Selenium Grid and command-line automation
- Where it doesn't
- Does not test on real devices
- Limited ecosystem beyond Selenium integrations
- Studio features cost more than manual testing
BrowseEmAll fact sheet, pricing and score →
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Last updated · How we research and update