Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

.bit (d.id) review

#17 of 21 in Blockchain Domain Services

Portable .bit names connect wallet aliases, on-chain profiles and IPFS-linked pages.

6.5/10Editor score
.bit (d.id)6.5 Visit .bit

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

For people who want a reusable identity across decentralized applications, .bit (d.id) provides human-readable names that can serve as wallet aliases and portable usernames. The d.id Team describes it as a decentralized identity protocol, with blockchain-based accounts managing ownership and records. It is aimed at individuals and organizations looking to connect wallet addresses and profile information to a name, rather than at users seeking a conventional domain registrar alone.

The feature set reaches beyond name resolution. .bit records can associate addresses and profile data with an identity, and the product supports linking website content through IPFS. Multi-chain NFT and asset profile pages, DID-based achievement records, and passkey account access extend the identity into profile and access use cases. That breadth may appeal to users who want a name to act as a portable profile across decentralized applications; teams seeking only a basic wallet alias may have less need for the additional profile features.

According to the stated pricing model, buyers contact sales, while the published product information does not lay out a public plan structure. The service is listed for web use and cloud deployment, with community and documentation as support channels. Those arrangements suit buyers comfortable with a self-managed decentralized identity model and community-oriented support. Organizations that need public plan comparisons or a different support path should weigh that before choosing .bit. Its fit depends on wanting cross-application identity, IPFS linking, and wallet resolution together, rather than simply registering a name for a conventional website.

.bit (d.id) pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Use human-readable .bit names as aliases across decentralized applications.
    • Associate wallet addresses and profile records with a decentralized identity.
    • Link IPFS website content and display NFTs and assets on profile pages.
  • Where it doesn't
    • The stated pricing model requires contacting sales.
    • The product is web-only and cloud-deployed.
    • Support is through community and documentation channels.

.bit (d.id) fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update