Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Basilisk review

Free#87 of 145 in Web BrowsersGoogle Chrome Alternatives

A free desktop browser for legacy compatibility and deep interface customization.

3.0/10Editor score
Basilisk3.0 Visit Basilisk

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Basilisk is a free, open-source desktop web browser for users who need compatibility with legacy web technologies alongside support for contemporary standards. It runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS and uses the Goanna rendering engine with the Unified XUL Platform rather than Chromium or modern Firefox architecture. Its traditional desktop-focused interface, customizable browser behavior, XUL extension support, and NPAPI plugin support make it particularly relevant to desktop users maintaining specialized or older workflows.

Customization and legacy compatibility are Basilisk's defining strengths. The browser supports XUL and overlay-based extensions, NPAPI plugins, and modern JavaScript, HTML, CSS, WebAssembly, and secure networking. Basilisk Add-ons provides an extension ecosystem, while optional Pale Moon Sync can support synchronization-related needs. This combination gives users more control over interface behavior and browser functionality than a narrowly standardized desktop setup, while retaining support for current web technologies.

Basilisk's free and open-source model makes it straightforward to evaluate without a paid tier or subscription structure. Its focus is narrower than that of a general-purpose browser, however: the legacy-oriented architecture and limited privacy features reduce its broad appeal, while optional rather than mandatory sync may be less suitable for users seeking a wider cross-device ecosystem. Choose Basilisk for desktop browsing, traditional controls, extension customization, and legacy plugin compatibility; choose an alternative if modern privacy features or a broader mainstream platform ecosystem are the priority.

Basilisk pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Supports XUL extensions and NPAPI plugins for legacy workflows
    • Runs on Windows, Linux, and macOS
    • Offers a customizable traditional desktop interface
  • Where it doesn't
    • Legacy-focused architecture may suit fewer general-purpose browsing needs
    • Sync is optional and limited to Pale Moon Sync support
    • Single-process browsing can constrain browser architecture flexibility

Basilisk fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update