Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Azure Web Application Firewall review

#7 of 35 in Web Application Firewall SoftwareWeb Security SoftwareWebsite Security Software

A low-cost managed WAF for Azure applications, APIs, and edge traffic.

8.7/10Editor score
Azure Web Application Firewall8.7 Visit site

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Azure Web Application Firewall is a managed web application firewall for organizations running applications on Azure. It protects websites and APIs from common web exploits, including SQL injection and cross-site scripting. The service supports edge deployment through Azure Front Door or regional protection through Application Gateway, with controls for managed rules, custom policies, bots, rate limits, IP access, geographic access, request parameters, methods, and sizes. It fits teams that want centrally managed Layer 7 traffic protection within the Azure ecosystem.

Pricing is structured across separate policy, rule, ruleset, and request-processing charges. The Policy plan starts at $5 per policy per month. Custom Rules add $1 per rule per month, while Custom Rules Requests Processed cost $0.60 per million requests. Default Ruleset adds $20 per month, and Managed Ruleset Requests Processed costs $1 per million requests. This structure gives smaller deployments a low starting point, but the total cost depends on the deployment and the volume of requests handled by custom and managed rules.

Its strongest fit is an Azure-centered environment that also uses Azure Front Door, Application Gateway, and Azure Monitor. The service combines managed rule sets with custom allow, block, log, redirect, and anomaly-score rules, plus bot protection and rate limiting. That breadth covers common web and API protection needs without requiring a separate WAF platform. Organizations seeking a broader integration range than Azure's verified connections may prefer a cloud alternative, while Azure users prioritizing native platform alignment and a $5 starting policy charge should consider this service.

Azure Web Application Firewall pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Azure-managed rules cover common web attacks
    • Custom rules, bot protection, rate limiting, and access controls
    • Azure Monitor provides monitoring and logging
  • Where it doesn't
    • No free plan
    • Pricing includes fixed and request-based charges
    • Verified integrations are narrower than leading cloud alternatives

Azure Web Application Firewall fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update