Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

atop review

Free#7 of 26 in Process Monitoring Software

A focused open-source monitor for detailed Linux process history and analysis.

8.7/10Editor score
atop8.7 Visit Atoptool.nl

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

atop is an open-source, terminal-based performance monitor for Linux systems. It combines live views of CPU, memory, swap, disk, and network utilization with per-process and per-thread resource consumption. Linux administrators, developers, and technical teams can use it to examine current system behavior as well as processes that have already finished. Its historical focus distinguishes it from monitors designed only for real-time observation, with compressed raw activity logs and system activity reports generated through atopsar.

The monitoring depth is its main strength. Process accounting preserves information about completed processes, while logged activity supports later analysis rather than limiting investigations to what is visible during an incident. Cgroup v2 resource and pressure monitoring adds a layer for environments where resource controls matter. Optional components extend the scope with per-process TCP and UDP statistics through netatop and system and process GPU statistics through atopgpud. The default daily logfile retention is documented as 28 days, giving routine historical review a defined baseline.

atop is distributed under the GPL and is available for Linux, making it a practical fit for teams that want an open-source, terminal-oriented tool centered on system and process behavior. It is less suitable when the buying decision depends on integrated alerting, automated responses, or broad platform coverage. The documented feature set emphasizes observation, accounting, logging, and reporting rather than workflow automation or integrations. Choose atop when detailed process history and low-level Linux visibility are priorities; consider another category option when operational teams need built-in notifications, actions, or a wider ecosystem.

atop pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Per-process and per-thread resource views
    • Compressed activity logs support long-term analysis
    • Finished-process accounting and atopsar reports
  • Where it doesn't
    • Linux-only platform support
    • Alerting and automated actions are not included
    • Network and GPU statistics require optional components

atop fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update