Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Apache Heron review

Free#25 of 25 in Streaming Analytics SoftwareStream Processing Software

A retired open-source engine for teams maintaining Storm-compatible streaming systems.

6.9/10Editor score
Apache Heron6.9 Visit Apache Heron

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Apache Heron was an open-source, distributed stream-processing engine developed initially by Twitter and later incubated at the Apache Software Foundation. It was designed for real-time, fault-tolerant processing through topology-based stream applications, making it relevant to teams maintaining self-hosted streaming systems and Apache Storm-compatible workloads. Its deployment model is self-hosted, and its published project status is retired rather than active.

Its strongest technical fit is a streaming architecture that needs structured topologies and configurable execution. Heron supported directed acyclic graph stream topologies, pluggable job-scheduler execution, process-based isolation for Heron instances, stream routing, metrics management, and pluggable state management including ZooKeeper integration. Its ecosystem included Apache Aurora, Apache Hadoop YARN, Apache Mesos, Apache REEF, Apache Kafka, Apache ZooKeeper, Scribe, Apache Storm, and Apache Thrift. Apache Storm API compatibility is particularly relevant for teams preserving Storm-oriented applications or migration paths.

Project status is the decisive limitation for new deployments. The official website redirects to Apache’s retired-project page, which records retirement on January 18, 2023, and the Apache GitHub repository is archived and read-only. That makes Heron most suitable for teams responsible for existing Heron systems or Storm-compatible self-hosted environments where continued maintenance is understood. Teams selecting a current streaming analytics platform for a new implementation should choose an actively maintained product instead. Heron’s open-source model and broad scheduler and integration design remain notable, but they do not offset its retired status for forward-looking adoption.

Apache Heron pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Apache Storm API compatibility supports existing Storm-oriented applications.
    • DAG topologies, routing, metrics, and state management support stream workflows.
    • Fault-tolerant processing with pluggable schedulers and process isolation.
  • Where it doesn't
    • The project retired on January 18, 2023.
    • The Apache repository is archived and read-only.
    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the deployment environment.

Apache Heron fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update