Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

AATT review

Free#123 of 163 in Accessibility Testing SoftwareWebsite Accessibility Tools

A Node.js testing API with multiple evaluation engines, aimed at automation workflows.

3.0/10Editor score
AATT3.0 Visit AATT

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

AATT is an open-source Node.js tool for automated accessibility testing of web applications. It is aimed at developers who want to evaluate pages through an API, a local web application, or an automation workflow. Its evaluation engines include Axe, HTML CodeSniffer, and Chrome developer tools, giving teams several ways to run checks rather than a single engine. The tool is primarily suited to technical teams building accessibility checks into their web testing process, not buyers looking for a manual audit service.

Its notable strength is the combination of evaluation options and workflow hooks. AATT can be used as a Node.js module, and the API can evaluate HTML source through the /evaluate endpoint. The product also integrates with NemoJS and NightwatchJS, with Selenium among its listed integrations. Coverage differs by engine: WCAG 2.1 support is specified for Axe, while HTML CodeSniffer offers WCAG 2A, WCAG 2AA, WCAG 2AAA, and Section 508 options. Teams should therefore match their required criteria to the chosen engine instead of assuming every engine supports the same standards.

AATT is open source under the BSD license and has a free plan, so it may suit developers seeking a self-hosted testing API without a paid tier decision. Its narrow focus is also a limitation: the described capabilities center on automated evaluation, with no manual review or remediation guidance described. The repository has no published releases, which may matter to teams that prefer a release-based distribution workflow. Choose AATT when an open-source API and automation integrations fit the team's process; consider another option if manual assessment or remediation support is central.

AATT pros and cons

  • Where it wins
    • Evaluates web pages with Axe, HTML CodeSniffer, or Chrome developer tools
    • Provides a local web app and an API, including the /evaluate endpoint
    • Supports Node.js use and NemoJS and NightwatchJS integrations
  • Where it doesn't
    • Automated testing focus may not suit teams seeking manual review
    • No remediation guidance is described
    • The repository has no published releases

AATT fact sheet, pricing and score →

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Last updated · How we research and update