Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more

Microsoft President Brad Smith says restricting highly skilled immigrants’ route to permanent residence could weaken U.S. technology for a generation by pushing scarce talent to countries that offer a clearer long-term future. His warning comes as the federal government tightens some H-1B rules, but temporary-visa restrictions and green-card limits are separate parts of the immigration system.

What Brad Smith said

Reuters reported on October 15, 2026, citing Politico’s account of Smith’s remarks, that the Microsoft president warned efforts to block or restrict permanent-residence pathways for highly skilled immigrants could “cripple” the U.S. technology sector for more than a generation. The argument is about long-term competitiveness rather than one hiring quarter: a worker who cannot reasonably become a permanent resident may choose an employer and country where staying is more predictable.

Smith made related points in 2026 testimony to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. He said the United States issues 140,000 employment-based green cards a year, a figure that includes eligible family members, and that some highly valued professionals can wait more than a decade for permanent residence. He also described backlogs exceeding four years for advanced-degree applicants born in China or India. The precise publication metadata for the testimony should be verified, but those quota and backlog figures are the basis of Smith’s stated concern.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Green cards and H-1B visas are not the same

The debate often combines two different stages of an immigrant professional’s career. H-1B status is a temporary work classification. An employment-based green card grants permanent-resident status, subject to the relevant category, quota and processing rules. An H-1B worker may remain employed for years while an employer-sponsored green-card case moves through the system, but a temporary status does not remove the uncertainty created by a long backlog.

Issue H-1B status Employment-based green card
Role in the system Temporary authorization for qualifying specialty-occupation work Permanent-residence pathway for qualifying workers and eligible dependents
What a restriction affects Entry, new petitions, extensions, changes of status or employer eligibility, depending on the rule Access to a limited number of permanent-residence visas and the speed of the queue
Why employers care Determines whether a person can start or continue a particular job Determines whether a valued employee can build a durable life in the United States
Main uncertainty in this dispute Implementation of current executive restrictions and any exceptions Annual limits, family-member allocations, per-country limits and congressional changes

A worker can therefore be legally employed in the United States while still facing a long-term immigration deadline. If the person cannot maintain H-1B status or sees no credible route to permanent residence, the employer risks losing that worker even when the job itself remains available.

#1 Best Overall

Why the 140,000-card ceiling creates a bottleneck

The annual employment-based figure cited by Smith is not 140,000 principal workers. It includes spouses and children in the categories that count family members against the total. The number of workers who can receive principal visas is consequently smaller than the headline figure suggests.

Per-country limits add another layer. Demand from large skilled-worker populations can fill a country’s share even when unused capacity exists elsewhere, producing queues for applicants born in countries such as China and India. A worker may have an approved employer petition yet still wait for a visa number to become available. During that period, changing jobs, changing employers or responding to a layoff can involve immigration risks that do not affect a similarly qualified U.S. worker.

Free tools Windows power users keep installed

One-click scans. No signup required.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Smith’s “more than a decade” estimate applies to some highly valued professionals, not every employment-based applicant. Processing time varies by category, country of birth, priority date, family composition and agency workload. The important policy point is that the system can tie a worker’s future to a queue far longer than the normal planning horizon for a technology career.

The separate H-1B restrictions now in effect

The White House’s September 18, 2026 proclamation extended covered H-1B entry restrictions through September 21, 2027. It also requires a $100,000 payment for covered petitions, subject to the proclamation’s stated exceptions. The payment and eligibility rules apply to the petitions covered by the proclamation; they should not be treated as a universal charge on every H-1B case.

This measure concerns H-1B entry and petition conditions, whereas Smith’s central warning concerns the permanent-residence pipeline. They interact in practice: a worker delayed in the green-card queue may need repeated temporary status extensions, and a costly or restricted H-1B route can make that interim period harder to sustain.

What Microsoft’s own filing numbers show

Microsoft’s October 8, 2026 corporate statement says the company submitted approximately 6,000 H-1B applications in the prior fiscal year. About 80% were extensions or changes of status for existing Microsoft employees, not requests to bring new people from abroad. The remaining filings for new employees were for individuals already legally in the United States who chose to join Microsoft, and Microsoft said that group equaled 1% of its U.S. workforce.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Those figures do not settle the national policy debate, but they do clarify what Microsoft says its filings represent. Counting every petition as a new foreign arrival would misdescribe the company’s account. Most of its reported filings maintained or changed the status of people already working in the United States, while the new-employee subset was small relative to its U.S. workforce and was already physically present legally.

Microsoft accompanied the figures with the statement, “We believe in the strength and talent of the American workforce.” Its position is that recruiting globally and developing U.S. employees are complementary rather than mutually exclusive activities.

How tighter pathways could affect U.S. technology

Retention and job continuity

Long queues can make an employee less willing to remain with a U.S. employer or accept a promotion that complicates an immigration case. A departure can interrupt projects, research programs and customer commitments, especially where the worker has specialized knowledge.

Competition for talent between countries

If a qualified engineer, scientist or founder can obtain permanent residence more predictably elsewhere, an American offer may lose to a foreign one even when U.S. compensation is competitive. Smith’s “more than a generation” warning reflects the cumulative effect of those choices: fewer workers enter, and some who trained or worked in the United States leave.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

Hiring costs and delays

Employers may spend more on legal processing, compliance and contingency staffing when a temporary status is expensive or uncertain. Smaller companies and research groups can be less able to absorb a failed petition or a sudden loss of a key employee than a large corporation.

Innovation and investment decisions

Companies deciding where to place laboratories, engineering teams and new products consider whether they can keep the people who build them. A restrictive or unpredictable immigration path can shift that investment, even if the immediate rule affects only a subset of workers.

Independent reader supportYour contribution helps us test, update, and keep practical guides available for everyone.Support on Ko-Fi

The administration’s competing case

Supporters of tighter H-1B and employment-based immigration controls argue that employers can use foreign-worker programs to suppress wages or displace U.S. workers. That rationale treats restrictions as a way to strengthen bargaining power and prioritize domestic hiring. Smith’s response is that a functioning technology economy also needs access to specialized skills and a credible path for those workers to stay. These are competing claims about labor-market effects, and the available Microsoft filing figures describe one employer rather than proving a nationwide outcome.

What could change next

The situation is unusually fluid. Agencies still have to interpret and implement the September proclamation, courts may review it, and employer eligibility or exceptions can change. Congress could also alter annual employment-based numbers, per-country rules or the treatment of family members. A news report about Smith’s warning is therefore not itself a change to green-card law.

Special offer. See more information about Outbyte and uninstall instructions. Please review EULA and Privacy policy.

For employers and workers, the practical questions are separate: whether a particular H-1B petition is covered by the proclamation and its payment requirement; whether the worker’s employment-based category has an available visa number; how a country-of-birth queue affects the priority date; and whether a proposed job or status change is allowed under current agency guidance. Those answers require case-specific advice because a general policy headline cannot determine an individual’s eligibility.

Bottom line

Smith’s warning is that restricting permanent-residence pathways would make the United States less able to retain the highly skilled people its technology sector depends on. The concern is amplified by a capped supply of employment-based green cards, family members counted within that supply, and long country-specific queues. The current H-1B proclamation adds a separate, temporary-visa constraint, while Microsoft says most of its recent H-1B filings involved existing employees and that new-hire filings represented only 1% of its U.S. workforce. Whether the policy produces the long-term damage Smith predicts will depend on implementation, litigation and any congressional changes to the permanent-residence system.

Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.