iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
U.S. AI policy is made through several channels, not by a single AI law or office. Congress can legislate and fund federal work, the President can set executive-branch priorities within existing law, and agencies apply statutes and directives through their own authorities, guidance, procurement, and programs.
How is U.S. AI policy made?
Federal AI policy is a mix of statutes, presidential actions, agency requirements and guidance, and coordination across the executive branch. These tools differ in legal status and reach: a statute is enacted law; an executive order directs executive-branch action within applicable law; and agency guidance or requirements operate through the agency’s authority and the context in which they are issued. Voluntary industry commitments are another policy approach, but they are not statutes or agency rules.
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), in its June 4, 2025 overview, describes federal efforts as including targeted legislation, agencies’ use of existing authorities, consideration of additional authorities, and voluntary industry commitments. The practical question is therefore not only what a policy says, but who issued it, what authority it relies on, whom it reaches, and whether it is proposed, directed, issued, or enacted. CRS, June 4, 2025
Free tools Windows power users keep installed
One-click scans. No signup required.
What role does Congress play in AI regulation?
Congress can create or change statutory authority, authorize federal activity, appropriate funding, and direct agencies to take or report on work. Legislation can also establish requirements or limits within its scope. A bill or presidential request for legislative language is not law: Congress must enact legislation through the legislative process before it changes statutory requirements.
The scope of federal AI law should be stated with a date. CRS reported on June 4, 2025, that no broad federal law establishing general regulatory authority for AI development or use, or broad AI prohibitions, had been enacted as of that report. That is a dated snapshot, not a claim about the status of federal law after June 4, 2025. The CRS report discusses policy approaches and options Congress may consider; it does not establish the status of every bill or later enactment.
What can an executive order do?
An executive order or memorandum can direct executive-branch officials to set priorities, review existing actions, coordinate, or prepare plans and recommendations. Its reach is different from a statute: it does not itself enact legislation, and executive action remains subject to applicable law. An order may direct agencies to act, but the resulting agency implementation can involve separate processes and authorities.
Executive Order 14179, dated January 23, 2025, directed the White House science and technology, AI, and national security advisers to develop an AI action plan and directed a review of actions associated with revoked Executive Order 14110. EO 14179 was a presidential direction, not an act of Congress or a new statute. Executive Order 14179, January 23, 2025
Executive Order 14365, dated December 11, 2025, directed development of a proposed national AI framework and called for a legislative recommendation. It also identified subjects that recommendation should not seek to preempt, including child safety, certain AI infrastructure matters, and state government procurement and use. These are directives about a proposed framework and recommendation, not enacted legislation. Executive Order 14365, December 11, 2025
As a more recent example, Executive Order 14434, dated September 29, 2026, directed agencies to use “Super Intelligence” and “SI” in specified non-statutory materials and asked for proposed legislative language within 60 days. The order does not itself amend statutory definitions. Executive Order 14434, September 29, 2026
How do federal agencies implement AI policy?
Agencies implement policy under statutes and presidential directions, using authorities that apply to their missions. Their work can include internal governance, guidance, procurement decisions, programs, and requirements that affect agency operations or other parties. Implementation is distributed rather than concentrated in one AI regulator.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported on September 9, 2025, that it had identified 94 government-wide or government-wide-impact AI-related requirements current or forthcoming as of July 2025, along with 10 executive-branch oversight and advisory groups with roles in federal AI implementation and oversight. The counts describe the scope GAO identified at those dates; they should not be read as a count of laws alone or as a current inventory beyond the report’s cutoff. GAO-25-107933, published September 9, 2025
Do these 3 things before closing this tab:
1Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitches2Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problems3Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteOffice of Management and Budget (OMB) memoranda are one significant channel for setting expectations about federal agencies’ own use of AI. Memorandum M-25-21, dated April 3, 2025, addresses innovation, governance, and public trust, and rescinds and replaces M-24-10. It is administrative guidance for federal agencies, not an act of Congress. OMB Memorandum M-25-21, April 3, 2025
Best Value
How to tell what a federal AI policy actually changes
When you encounter a new AI policy announcement, separate its goal from its legal mechanism and check its status. A press release describing a plan, an order directing officials to prepare a recommendation, and an enacted statute are not interchangeable.
- Identify the actor. Is the action from Congress, the President or White House, an agency, or a voluntary industry group?
- Identify the mechanism. Is it a statute, executive direction, agency action or guidance, or a voluntary commitment?
- Check what it directs or governs. Note the affected agencies, activities, or parties, and whether the action relies on existing authority or calls for Congress to provide authority.
- Check its status and date. Distinguish a proposal or instruction to prepare a proposal from an issued requirement or enacted law. For any numerical claim or inventory, check the source’s cutoff date.
This distinction matters in debates over safety, security, innovation, agency authority, and whether a national approach should limit state-level variation. A presidential directive can shape executive-branch priorities, but a proposed national framework or legislative recommendation does not by itself settle what Congress has enacted or what states may do.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
