Recommended Free Tools
iTechGuides is reader-supported. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. Learn more
Role-based access control (RBAC) grants access to resources through roles: administrators assign permissions to roles, then assign users to the roles appropriate to their responsibilities. A user’s access is mediated by an authorized role and may also be limited by rules governing which roles can be assigned or activated together.
What is role-based access control?
Role-based access control is an access-control model in which permitted actions are associated with roles rather than assigned directly to each individual user. NIST defines it as “A model for controlling access to resources where permitted actions on resources are identified with roles rather than with individual subject identities.” NIST CSRC glossary
A role is an administrative grouping that can represent a job function or responsibility. The model creates a bridge between users and permissions: an organization decides what a role can do, then assigns authorized people or system subjects to that role. NIST RBAC project overview Ferraiolo, Cugini, and Kuhn, 1995
How does RBAC work?
- Define roles. Group access needs around organizational responsibilities, such as a payroll clerk role.
- Attach permissions to roles. Specify which operations each role may perform on protected resources. For example, a payroll clerk role might allow staff to enter payroll information.
- Assign users to roles. Give each user membership only in roles authorized for that person.
- Activate an authorized role for a session. When a user requests an operation, access is checked through the role active in the session and the permissions and constraints that apply.
NIST’s FAQ describes three rules in the original formal model: role assignment, role authorization, and transaction authorization. In practical terms, the subject must have an assigned or selected role, the role must be authorized for that subject, and the requested transaction must be allowed through that role, subject to constraints. NIST RBAC FAQs
#1 Best Overall
What are RBAC’s main components?
NIST’s model describes four components. An implementation can support some or all of them; the label “RBAC” by itself does not guarantee every optional feature.
Core RBAC
Core RBAC covers the basic relationships among users, roles, and permissions: users are assigned to roles, permissions are assigned to roles, and users can activate authorized roles in sessions.
Rank #2
Hierarchical RBAC
Hierarchies define relationships among roles and can convey inherited permissions. For instance, a role higher in a hierarchy may include permissions associated with a lower role, depending on how the implementation defines the relationship.
Quick wins for a faster PC:
Scan for outdated or missing drivers - takes under a minuteDriver Scan →Repair Windows errors before they cause bigger problemsFix Now →Fix the driver behind crashes, sound loss and screen glitchesFind Drivers →Static separation of duty
Static separation-of-duty rules constrain role assignment. They can prevent one user from being assigned to combinations of roles that would create a conflict.
Dynamic separation of duty
Dynamic separation-of-duty rules constrain role use, such as which roles a user may activate together in a session. This differs from static separation: one limits assignments, while the other limits activation or use. NIST RBAC project overview NIST, The NIST Role in Role-Based Control: A 20th Anniversary Appraisal
What does RBAC standardization establish?
NIST’s archived project page records adoption of the model as ANSI/INCITS 359-2004 and a revision as INCITS 359-2012. The page is marked archived and no longer supported or updated, so it documents that history but does not establish the standard’s current status. For compliance or procurement decisions, verify the current standard with its publisher. NIST RBAC project overview
The model’s foundations include David F. Ferraiolo, Janet A. Cugini, and D. Richard Kuhn’s 1995 work, which describes permissions as administratively associated with roles and users as members of appropriate roles, and Wayne Jansen’s 1998 revised formal model. These works explain the model’s development; they do not certify that any particular current product conforms to a standard. NIST, RBAC: Features and Motivations NIST, A Revised Model for Role-Based Access Control
What’s actually slowing this PC down?
Pick the symptom - the matching free tool is one click away.
When is RBAC useful?
RBAC is useful when an organization can manage access more consistently by grouping permissions around responsibilities instead of assigning each permission individually to each user. A change in staff or duties can then be handled by changing role membership, while role permissions remain centrally defined. Whether that approach fits a particular system depends on how its responsibilities and access needs map to roles.
Best Value
When evaluating an RBAC implementation, check which model components it supports, how role inheritance works, whether it enforces static and dynamic separation of duty, how role assignment and session activation are handled, and what administrative and audit capabilities are available. The term RBAC alone does not answer those implementation questions.
Quick Recap
Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply.
