Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Vector Database Hosting

Zilliz Cloud vs turbopuffer

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score Zilliz Cloud #5 in Vector Database Hosting 8.9/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 2 of 3 features Visit Zilliz Cloud

Zilliz Cloud leads on 2 checks, turbopuffer on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreZilliz Cloud · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly Zilliz Cloud
  • Free trialonly Zilliz Cloud

Zilliz Cloud scores higher on our rubric for vector database hosting: 8.9 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Zilliz Cloud offers free plan; turbopuffer doesn't. Zilliz Cloud leads on maximum dimensions: 32768 dimensions versus 10752 dimensions.

Zilliz Cloud is the better fit for managed Milvus-compatible deployments. turbopuffer is the better fit for high-scale managed vector workloads.

  • Zilliz Cloud fits best

    Managed Milvus-compatible deployments

  • turbopuffer fits best

    High-scale managed vector workloads

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Zilliz Cloud 8.9/10 Visit ↗ turbopuffer 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.6
Ranking #5 in Vector Database Hosting #8 in Vector Database Hosting
Best for Managed Milvus-compatible deployments High-scale managed vector workloads
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price — $16/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Email, Community, Docs · 24/7
Compliance SSO/SAML, 2FA, GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, ISO 27001 SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Zilliz Cloud 2/3 · turbopuffer 2/3
Hybrid search ✓ ✓
Metadata filtering ✓ ✓
Serverless scaling Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment regions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Maximum dimensions 32768 dimensions (best) 10752 dimensions
Our review
Pros
  • Hybrid, sparse, BM25, and full-text search in one service
  • Free tier includes 5 GB storage and up to 5 collections
  • SaaS and BYOC deployment options with backup and migration tools
  • Combines dense, sparse, BM25, and hybrid search
  • Supports exact filtered kNN and metadata filtering
  • Offers branching, sharding, embedding, and BYOC deployment
Cons
  • Paid pricing uses variable operation or compute charges
  • Deployment is cloud-focused rather than self-hosted
  • Not open source, which limits platform ownership options
  • There is no free plan
  • Launch uses a $16 monthly minimum usage commitment
  • Enterprise pricing starts at >=$4,096/month plus a 35% usage premium
Our verdict

Zilliz Cloud is a fully managed Milvus service for teams building and operating vector search applications. It provides cloud-hosted clusters for semantic search, retrieval-augmented generation, recommendations, and multimodal retrieval.…

Read the review →

turbopuffer is a hosted search database for AI applications, semantic search, recommendations, and other retrieval workloads. It combines dense and sparse vector search with full-text BM25 search, metadata filtering, branching, and…

Read the review →
  1. Zilliz CloudVector Database Hosting 8.9Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. turbopufferVector Database Hosting 8.6Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Zilliz Cloud — where it wins

    • Hybrid, sparse, BM25, and full-text search in one service
    • Free tier includes 5 GB storage and up to 5 collections
    • SaaS and BYOC deployment options with backup and migration tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid pricing uses variable operation or compute charges
    • Deployment is cloud-focused rather than self-hosted
    • Not open source, which limits platform ownership options
  • turbopuffer — where it wins

    • Combines dense, sparse, BM25, and hybrid search
    • Supports exact filtered kNN and metadata filtering
    • Offers branching, sharding, embedding, and BYOC deployment

    Where it doesn't

    • There is no free plan
    • Launch uses a $16 monthly minimum usage commitment
    • Enterprise pricing starts at >=$4,096/month plus a 35% usage premium

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update