Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · JavaScript Package Managers

Yarn vs cnpm

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Yarn #3 in JavaScript Package Managers 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 6 features Visit Yarn
cnpm #8 in JavaScript Package Managers 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit cnpm

Yarn leads on 0 checks, cnpm on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreYarn · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featurescnpm · 5 of 6

Yarn scores higher on our rubric for javascript package managers: 9.0 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

Yarn is the better fit for teams wanting flexible install strategies. cnpm is the better fit for npm-compatible users needing registry flexibility.

  • Yarn fits best

    Teams wanting flexible install strategies

  • cnpm fits best

    npm-compatible users needing registry flexibility

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Yarn 9.0/10 Visit ↗ cnpm 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 7.8
Ranking #3 in JavaScript Package Managers #8 in JavaScript Package Managers
Best for Teams wanting flexible install strategies npm-compatible users needing registry flexibility
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business
Features Yarn 0/6 · cnpm 5/6
Workspace support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Lockfile support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Peer dependency handling Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Package publishing Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Offline package cache Not checked yet Not checked yet
Global installation Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Immutable lockfile installs support repeatable dependency setup
  • Workspaces support linked monorepositories
  • Plug'n'Play, node_modules, and offline caching offer install flexibility
  • npm-compatible commands with package-lock.json compatibility
  • Custom and private registry configuration
  • Workspaces, peer dependencies, and global installs
Cons
  • Modern Yarn 4+ and Classic 1.x follow separate documentation
  • Multiple installation strategies require a project-level choice
  • Security checks and private registry access add configuration considerations
  • Uses npminstall by default instead of the original npm installer
  • No AI features
  • Node.js environment required
Our verdict

Yarn is an open-source package manager and project manager for JavaScript projects. It handles dependency resolution and installation, updates, configuration, and removal from npm package registries. Its feature set suits individual…

Read the review →

cnpm is an open-source command-line JavaScript package manager and npm client associated with the npmmirror.com registry. It is aimed at developers and teams that want npm-style commands while working with a different default registry or…

Read the review →
  1. YarnJavaScript Package Managers 9.0Free plan
  2. cnpmJavaScript Package Managers 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Yarn — where it wins

    • Immutable lockfile installs support repeatable dependency setup
    • Workspaces support linked monorepositories
    • Plug'n'Play, node_modules, and offline caching offer install flexibility

    Where it doesn't

    • Modern Yarn 4+ and Classic 1.x follow separate documentation
    • Multiple installation strategies require a project-level choice
    • Security checks and private registry access add configuration considerations
  • cnpm — where it wins

    • npm-compatible commands with package-lock.json compatibility
    • Custom and private registry configuration
    • Workspaces, peer dependencies, and global installs

    Where it doesn't

    • Uses npminstall by default instead of the original npm installer
    • No AI features
    • Node.js environment required

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update