Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · ML Experiment Tracking Software

Weights & Biases vs ClearML

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Weights & Biases #1 in ML Experiment Tracking Software 8.9/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 1 of 5 features Try Weights & Biases
ClearML #2 in ML Experiment Tracking Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 1 of 5 features Visit ClearML

Weights & Biases leads on 0 checks, ClearML on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreWeights & Biases · 8.9/10
  • Lowest starting priceClearML · $15/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Weights & Biases

Weights & Biases scores higher on our rubric for ml experiment tracking software: 8.9 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

ClearML is cheaper to start at $15/user/mo against $60/user/mo.

Weights & Biases is the better fit for organizations needing a mature full ML platform. ClearML is the better fit for teams wanting broad, affordable experiment management.

  • Weights & Biases fits best

    Organizations needing a mature full ML platform

  • ClearML fits best

    Teams wanting broad, affordable experiment management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Weights & Biases 8.9/10 Visit ↗ ClearML 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.8
Ranking #1 in ML Experiment Tracking Software #2 in ML Experiment Tracking Software
Best for Organizations needing a mature full ML platform Teams wanting broad, affordable experiment management
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $60/mo $15/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Browser extension Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS Web
Support Email, Live chat, Community · 24/7 Email, Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 9 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Weights & Biases 1/5 · ClearML 1/5
Run comparison Not checked yet Not checked yet
Artifact tracking Not checked yet Not checked yet
Dataset versioning Not checked yet Not checked yet
Model registry ✓ ✓
API and SDK access Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment options Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers tracking, sweeps, versioning, registry, serving, and monitoring
  • Supports managed, dedicated, and self-hosted deployment options
  • Integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow, Hugging Face, and scikit-learn
  • Community includes tracking, datasets, models, pipelines, and orchestration
  • Supports web, API, self-hosted, VPC, on-premises, air-gapped, and hybrid deployments
  • Integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Hugging Face, Optuna, and Hydra
Cons
  • Pro starts at $60 per month when billed monthly
  • The Free plan includes community support rather than priority support
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking tracking alone
  • Scale and Enterprise use quote-based pricing
  • Pro adds usage-based storage and activity costs
  • Its broad MLOps scope may exceed the needs of tracking-only teams
Our verdict

Weights & Biases is an AI developer platform for machine-learning and AI teams working across development, training, evaluation, and production operations. Its core capabilities include experiment tracking and visualization, hyperparameter…

Read the review →

ClearML is an open-source AI infrastructure and MLOps platform for data scientists, ML engineers, DevOps teams, and enterprises. Its scope extends from experiment tracking to dataset versioning, model management, pipeline orchestration,…

Read the review →
  1. Weights & BiasesML Experiment Tracking Software 8.9Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. ClearMLML Experiment Tracking Software 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Weights & Biases — where it wins

    • Covers tracking, sweeps, versioning, registry, serving, and monitoring
    • Supports managed, dedicated, and self-hosted deployment options
    • Integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow, Hugging Face, and scikit-learn

    Where it doesn't

    • Pro starts at $60 per month when billed monthly
    • The Free plan includes community support rather than priority support
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking tracking alone

  • ClearML — where it wins

    • Community includes tracking, datasets, models, pipelines, and orchestration
    • Supports web, API, self-hosted, VPC, on-premises, air-gapped, and hybrid deployments
    • Integrates with PyTorch, TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Hugging Face, Optuna, and Hydra

    Where it doesn't

    • Scale and Enterprise use quote-based pricing
    • Pro adds usage-based storage and activity costs
    • Its broad MLOps scope may exceed the needs of tracking-only teams

More comparisons

All ML experiment tracking software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update